IMHO...
That's kind of a list of entities. It's not so straightforward as a list of entities.
I can only recommend methodical (probably going to be slow, but no need to rush) research - and certainly not making rash judgements along the way. We have no need to fear the truth (it just may be shocking when it sets in, but have faith). In complex issues, it can be difficult to know when or if we've arrived at the truth. Also, nwo specifically puts information into the public sphere that seemingly attacks them, so we take it to be 100% true, but other relavant, key parts of the story are omitted, which hides the truth and also makes what they disclosed to seem to be untrue.
I saw the other post mentioned the modern State of Israel. Mention of Israel brings out emotions both for and against which can cloud the issues.
It's impossible to understand the founding of the modern state of Israel without understanding the business elites of Europe, i.e., the Continent and the UK in the 1800's.
It's important to understand what the
banking families are all about, and one must have some sort of empathy for the individuals born into very wealthy families. Family members will, like everyone, vary in their feelings of their nation, ethnicity and religion. But we must keep in mind, of course, that the views of members of ultra-wealthy families do not constitute the views of everyone of their national, ethnic or religious affiliations as a whole.
There are a few very simple (shockingly so) concepts that are fundamental to the thinking of financial elites, and these are very basic concepts that they make use. For example:
* The usefulness of framing both sides of an argument and simple techniques for doing so (
* The usefulness of getting two groups fighting each other
* Exposing what you're doing, minus a few key parts, as a way of hiding what you're doing
* The power of being an advisor
* The power of being a creditor
* The advantages of having assets and operations in multiple nations
* The power of information; intelligence, the press, etc.
* Devotion to one's ideas, family and business; some to the point of what can only be called disregard or even contempt for the non-wealthy, which, for some, can mean disregard for others of one's nationality, ethnicity or religion.
* The precedance that wealth so often takes over other common attributes in personal relationships
* The tendency for financial elites, like royal families, to marry within there sphere
The roles and the relationships of the entities are key to understanding nwo; it's not so much specific entities as "interests" at the top. They have certain directions they find useful to go in, and numerous strategies to do so, like the "foundation system", controlling education, controlling the news media, "philanthropy", etc.
One basic idea behind nwo is that organizationally it is "above" or "out of the reach" of government, per se, since it simply uses several very powerful levers of influence strategies to have government serve the leadership of nwo instead of those individuals having the role of ordinary citizens. Not being inside those circles of power, it is very difficult to pinpoint the most powerful figures other than the most obvious ones. Most often when we point to a very powerful nwo individual, they are not one of its leaders but they serve nwo in some capacity. Governmental figures fall into that category.