Yes, I am aware of that. I am a scientist, and I know of NO scientist who refers to himself as an “evolutionary scientist”. In REAL science, the closest specialist you can get to “evolutionary scientist” is simply biologist. I was just ridiculing the notion that evolution has anything at all to do with these astronomical observations.
The problem with the creationists is that they attempt to portray themselves as against just one theory of science (one which most of them barely understand, if at all) - but in doing so have to keep expanding the reach of that one theory until it encompasses just about every field of science.