Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73
Reasonable or not your suggestions do nothing to further a real solution. They aren't really harsher than current laws for the most part either.

RE: Employers - fine of $1M/per, adjusted for inflation

I don't know how fines range but current law includes criminal sanctions ie prison time.

RE: Entitlements - they are Unconstitutional to begin with, they shouldn’t even be an option for any illegal, regardless of circumstance.

If you would deny anyone true emergency care then you're worse than an illegal alien. You're a monster.

RE: Anchors - moot point if they followed the actually verbiage of the 14th.

That's a moot point since we have SCOTUS decisions that support the current anchor baby policy. Congress can change that thus my recommendation.

I’d have made it a point that they/Country of origin pays for the return, and those deported micro-stamped.

A useless waste of taxpayer money. Employ the things I listed and they will self-deport en-mass and pay for it themselves. It's redundant and self-punitive to make legal requirements for repayment from the country of origin.

10 posted on 02/22/2013 12:45:31 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

IMHO, dismantle the welfare system and the illegal immigration problem disappears.

Current law is routinely flouted and side-stepped. Hitting them in the wallets will do much more than a simple plea-out, if they’re prosecuted at all.

Monster? So I’m a slave to those who break our laws with impunity? Let their own country take care of their own Citizens. If that makes me a ‘monster’, so be it, I won’t be losing any sleep.

SCOTUS is not the final arbiter of the Law, We the People are the beginning and end. Congress doesn’t have the stones to pass a real CUT in the budget, but you expect them to follow the Constitution, as written??

Redundant? Self punitive? What’s stopping the multi-border jumper these days? Continual re-deportation? Bad enough the drain on our healthcare/education system, let alone the auto accident problems....Hell, might as well give them a how-to apply for ‘benefits’ in their own language. Wait, what? We already do? Make it hurt on the originating end and maybe they’ll start fixing their own problems instead of exporting them here.


11 posted on 02/22/2013 8:09:10 PM PST by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

I will have to disagree with the anchor baby statement. The Supreme Court DID NOT rule on whether the child of 2 illegal aliens is or is not a citizen.

The supreme Court ruled in Wong Kim Ark that the chid of legal permanent residents was a US citizen. Sorry that is not the same as 2 illegal alien parents.

The only person who can change that situation now is a Governor. A Governor with a very large package simply instructs their vital statistics department to deny a bc or a bc with a disclaimer on it and wa-la you go to the Supreme Court for a ruling. Call your Governor’s office make an appointment and see if he will do it.


13 posted on 02/22/2013 10:28:45 PM PST by jdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson