Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for a Higher Gasoline Tax (NYSlimes)
NY Times ^

Posted on 02/22/2013 3:25:08 PM PST by matt04

THE average price of gasoline in the United States, $3.78 on Thursday, has been steadily climbing for more than a month and is approaching the three previous post-recession peaks, in May 2011 and in April and September of last year.

But if our goal is to get Americans to drive less and use more fuel-efficient vehicles, and to reduce air pollution and the emission of greenhouse gases, gas prices need to be even higher. The current federal gasoline tax, 18.4 cents a gallon, has been essentially stable since 1993; in inflation-adjusted terms, it’s fallen by 40 percent since then.

...

Greater efficiency packs less of a psychological punch because consumers pay more only when they buy a new car. In contrast, motorists are reminded regularly of the price at the pump. But the new fuel-efficiency standards are far less efficient than raising gasoline prices.

In a paper published online this week in the journal Energy Economics, I and other scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology estimate that the new standards will cost the economy on the whole — for the same reduction in gas use — at least six times more than a federal gas tax of roughly 45 cents per dollar of gasoline. That is because a gas tax provides immediate, direct incentives for drivers to reduce gasoline use, while the efficiency standards must squeeze the reduction out of new vehicles only. The new standards also encourage more driving, not less.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fishwrapofrecord; mit; nyslimes; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: matt04
This is ironic, because the NYslimes were the ones leading the way in 2006 with all the stories bashing Bush on the high gas prices.

I wish we had those prices now.

5.56mm

21 posted on 02/22/2013 5:09:15 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

$5/gal. tax plus a 10 gal. per week ration card will solve the problem. That problem is solved, what else needs done?

Greenhouse gases? Tax’em! Ugly dogs? Tax’em! More and more, tax is the cure, don’t relax’em, tax’em!


22 posted on 02/22/2013 5:54:52 PM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Leave it to the Times to push a program that will cause people to cancel their NYT subscriptions because they have less disposable income.


23 posted on 02/22/2013 5:56:52 PM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Whoever wrote this is one crazy son of a bi7ch.


24 posted on 02/22/2013 6:00:54 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matt04

http://mitei.mit.edu/education/fellowships/martin-fellows/valerie-j-karplus

the author


25 posted on 02/22/2013 6:04:20 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
But if our goal is to get Americans to drive less and use more fuel-efficient vehicles, and to reduce air pollution and the emission of greenhouse gases, gas prices need to be even higher.

Hey, Slimes creatures, what if our goal is to get from here to there at the least cost? And, being intelligent human beings, we've learned that global warming is a hoax -- so that your hyperventilation over "greenhouse gases" is utterly pointless.

That leaves you guys SOL, if I'm not mistaken.

26 posted on 02/22/2013 6:16:46 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
Exactly!

But if our goal is to get Americans to drive less and use more fuel-efficient vehicles

At what point can we no longer "drive less?" It's been years since I've just gotten into the car to take a drive. I now only drive to and from work, my shopping trips are on my way home from work, since there's a grocery store and a Walmart right on the way. The only other trips I've taken in the last 6 months have been Dr appointments. I'm not really sure how to go about "driving less."

And then there's that little fact that as energy costs increase, the cost of EVERYTHING increases, leaving us all poorer.

And as the cost of gasoline goes up, one has less money to save or disposable income to buy one of those nifty gas saving cars we keep hearing about.

I heard that when Obama was confronted with a question about high gasoline prices, his response was "drive less." Gee, must be nice to have limousines and airplanes at one's disposal, 24x7 and more than one so Angry Wookie could take the kids to CO for skiing, while Barkey went to FL, all on the taxpayers' dime. He's not out of touch, is he?

Mark

27 posted on 02/22/2013 6:24:42 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
if our goal is to get Americans to drive less

Oh, that's easy. End rent control in Manhattan. Watch all the new apartment buildings go up and people can start living near where their jobs are. C'mon NYSlimes! Advocate an end to rent control!

You know we need it. All these little condos and co-ops just aren't keeping up with demand and the population growth. We need more buildings like in the old days. You know, back when they were still profitable.

28 posted on 02/22/2013 6:38:16 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
I'm not really sure how to go about "driving less."

In the liberal mind, "driving less" translates to everybody living in high rise apartments in Utopia City, commuting to work via public transportation.

In fact, you won't need a car at all. Your bicycle will take you to the non-profit state food & drug store half-a-mile away. And there is a park within walking distance.

Why would you need a car?

Indeed, the only people who need cars in Utopia City are with the state apparat, party members who require chauffeurs to drive them down the empty boulevards to their dachas for the weekend.

If you must drive, perhaps you can get a position as a chauffeur.

29 posted on 02/22/2013 7:02:40 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: matt04

New Jersey has about the cheapest gas in the East (the Northeast,at least).Perhaps the Slimes’ editors know of some cheap stations across the river.


30 posted on 02/22/2013 7:33:15 PM PST by Gay State Conservative ("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor
Climate policy design for personal vehicle transportation; energy-economic modeling. Reducing vehicle greenhouse gas emissions.

No bias here. Move along.

31 posted on 02/22/2013 8:58:27 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; All
(A BIG Thanks to FReeper Joe Pro Bono for the pic!!)


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


32 posted on 02/22/2013 9:05:28 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: matt04

>”But if our goal is to get Americans to drive less and use more fuel-efficient vehicles, and to reduce air pollution and the emission of greenhouse gases, gas prices need to be even higher”<

Our Goal, who is “our”?


33 posted on 02/22/2013 9:16:09 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (When the Sheep elect a Wolf to lead them, it's time for the Sheepdogs to move to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson