Nor would I. I've stated repeatedly that the cops involved should be held criminally and civilly responsible for their actions.
Apparently there are too many posters incapable of understanding plain English.
Oh, we understand plain English, all right.
We also understand Sophistry. "It depends on what the meaning of is, is..."
This article is about the police blasting away at ANYTHING they thought was Crisptopher Dorner. As Steven Greenhut wrote, "The police wouldn’t excuse a member of the public for misusing a firearm, regardless of how stressed out that person felt."
Well, they're excusing themselves, and YOU'RE excusing them, too. "Yes, yet they didn't kill anyone..." "It was dark. How good are you at seeing colors when it is dark? What do you suggest, walking up to a potential murderous fugitive and asking for a driver;'s license?" "However, there are extenuating circumstances that explain their response." "Is it true that the shooting incident with the 'surfer' occurred while it was dark?" "Thanks for posting. I wasn't aware the shooting incident with the two women victims occurred in the dark at 4:30 AM." and on and on and on, interspersed with foamings about other posters being "retarded", "drama queens", "liars", "cowards", "mindless", "whining", "bullies", "CT freak", "mental midget", "hysterical BS", "deranged", "insane", "psychopath", "incapable of understanding plain English"
And the crowning Sophist lie of A. Troll: "No one is defending the actions of the cops."
Well, except for the Apologist Wolf. BTW - he claims to have learned his vicious trolling trade on Liberty Post. It might be one of the few things that's not just a flat-out trolling post...
Yes, you have used those words.
Somehow we are still left doubting your sincerity. Why do you suppose that is, hmmm?