Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamanomics And The Jewish Deli Dilemma
Townhall.com ^ | February 24, 2013 | Austin Hill

Posted on 02/24/2013 4:01:18 AM PST by Kaslin

Did you hear the big news from the world of small business? Jewish delis are closing in both Los Angeles, and New York City.

The trend has been a long time in the making, especially in New York City where Jewish delis’s used to number in the thousands and now total less than one hundred. Yet the Los Angeles Times reported this “news” just this past week, and the details that the report included – and the details that were ignored– point to some far greater problems.

The article, written by Journalist Tiffany Hsu, notes that the decline of the L.A. area Jewish delis “seems to be accelerating partly because of health concerns over the schmaltz-spread fare...” This may very well be the case – certainly American adults are inclined to being more “health conscious” with their dietary choices, rather than less, and food categories of all types that are perceived to be un-healthy are probably headed for a declined in consumption.

From there, the article suggests that “skyrocketing” food costs have driven some delis out of business. That may be true, too, but what has caused that to happen? The article suggests that “mass exports” of food to Japan is the culprit on the price spike. The story also blames the decline of LA-area Jewish delis on “the recession,” “too much competition” from other restaurant sectors, and the notion that younger consumers “don’t understand delis and comfort food.”

It was only one small news story in the LA Times. But let’s think through some of the ideas in this news story – ideas reported as “facts” – and consider what they mean from an economic standpoint. Consider, for example, the notion of “too much competition.” What exactly does this mean?

Obviously the more competitive a marketplace is, the more difficult it is for any particular business entity to survive and thrive. But how do we know when the level of competition is appropriate, and when it is “too much?”

Americans are accustomed to fierce competition in other arenas – in sports, especially, and even in the arts and entertainment. Similarly, most of us would never say “my favorite team didn’t make it to the Super Bowl this year because there was too much competition in the NFL.”

But when it comes to local small businesses, we often succumb to this vague, un-defined notion that there is this magical amount of competition that’s “just right,” and if our favorite business can’t compete, then therefore there is “too much” competition.

Yet in our free market economic system, we understand that competition is a good thing. If competition means that certain business entities or entire business categories decline because of the competition, then so be it. It is fairer and more just to allow businesses to rise and fall according to the market demands of consumers, rather than imposing artificial “limits” on the number of people who are to be permitted to participate in an industry.

But what are we to make of this idea that the delis’ failure is because consumers “don’t understand?” If a consumer chooses to “not understand” any particular business, and therefore chooses not to patronize it, then that consumer has made their choice – haven’t they? We’re all better-off if, win or lose, we honor and respect the choices of consumers, rather than presuming that they are ignorant if they make a choice that we don’t like.

And guess what the LA Times article about the delis completely ignored? The impact of government policy on small businesses. Nowhere did it reference the expansive and onerous mandates placed upon business via Obamacare, the impact on business owners of the President’s payroll tax hike, or his income tax increases on “rich people.”

No, the LA Times apparently wasn’t interested in how the President’s income tax hikes have taken money away from what the I.R.S. designates as “Subchapter S Corporations” (sometimes abbreviated as “S-corps”), and how this has effectively taken money directly out of small corporations, many of which operate small businesses. Likewise, the article made no reference to the fact California voters approved an increase in state income tax rates for “rich people” (thus leading to even less revenue in Subchapter-S Corporations) on their ballot last November, nor did it acknowledge that California has for years been on a trajectory of higher and higher unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation mandates for businesses.

It is perhaps more comfortable to pretend that our current government policies are not problematic, and blame the struggling economy on “too much competition” and consumers who “don’t understand.”

But how many more delis must fail, before we get honest and acknowledge that government is our problem?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abortion; california; deathpanels; economy; newyork; obamacare; obamanomics; obamarecession; obamataxhike; smallbusiness; taxes; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: DH

So true.

I have tasted real Mexican home cooking and it isn’t 10-alarm, just subtle and interesting with the blending of so many flavors.

A Mexican friend once told me that every woman in Mexico has her own family recipe for mole. Mine has coffee and dark bitter chocolate and pineapple, among other flavors. It never comes out the same twice, though.

I am a Yankee, though: I do put beans in my chili. So, no one is perfect.


41 posted on 02/24/2013 2:01:37 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DH

So true.

I have tasted real Mexican home cooking and it isn’t 10-alarm, just subtle and interesting with the blending of so many flavors.

A Mexican friend once told me that every woman in Mexico has her own family recipe for mole. Mine has coffee and dark bitter chocolate and pineapple, among other flavors. It never comes out the same twice, though.

I am a Yankee, though: I do put beans in my chili. So, no one is perfect.


42 posted on 02/24/2013 2:04:30 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Used to be that brisket & flanken were inexpensive substitutes for T-bone & porterhouse. Marinate, grill, slice thin across the grain. Not cheap any more.

I remember corned beef & cabbage as a kid. Nowadays I wonder if those packaged corned briskets are any good.

Cooking something, anything on the stove is ALWAYS better than nuking convenience food. The microwave is for emergency use only.


43 posted on 02/24/2013 2:17:54 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Yeah, I had sticker shock last time I looked at a brisket. Even the whole muscle in cryovac is still over $3/lb.

I confess to buying the packaged corned beef at times.Not too bad. I prefer the flat to the point and I add more pickling spice to the cooking water. Then, I will trim the excess fat using a meat slicer to get thin slices. The packaged ones do shrink alot.

Still, if I recall, it only takes a few days in brine in the fridge to make your own. I have to go find a recipe, because I don’t really remember. It seems to me it was juicier, more tender and shrank less than the pre-corned ones. Ok, I checked: it takes a week in the brine and I remember using Quick Cure.

I steam the cabbage separately and serve w/boiled new potatoes w/sour cream. We prefer the cabbage still a bit crispy. This discussion is making me hungry.


44 posted on 02/24/2013 2:31:55 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Steamed cabbage...instead of boiled to a fare-thee-well. Have to try that, the rice steamer works well with veggies.

New potatoes w/corned beef & cabbage - that’s not a calorie disaster. Good working fare - the kind my grandmother made and my coal miner grandfather liked.


45 posted on 02/24/2013 5:03:50 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

47 posted on 02/25/2013 5:22:20 AM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson