http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/26/rand-paul-continues-attempt-to-block-chu/print
according to this he voted no on cloture, said he didn’t know how he was going to vote, then voted yes. Hopefully he will explain his vote as he hasn’t been for Hagel.
– Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said his support for a filibuster against Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel never meant that he would vote against Hagel’s confirmation.
“I voted no because I wanted more information and I think that part of what the
Senate does is try to get information about the nominees,” Paul told reporters in the
basement of the Capitol after Hagel’s confirmation Tuesday. “I’ve said all along
that I give the president some prerogative in choosing his political appointees.”
“There are many things I disagree with Chuck Hagel on, there are many things I
disagree with John Kerry on, there are very few things I agree with the president on,
but the president gets to choose political appointees,” Paul said.
Asked if he ever got the information he wanted about Hagel, Paul said that he hadn’t.