And actually, I support the 1St Amendment every bit as much as the 10th. If my religion says "no Gay marriage"... It isn't up to your beloved government to tell me otherwise.
At least, it wouldn't be if you idiots didn't want perks for marriage and went the "license" route.
Your logic is in pretzels and you have no clue what you are advocating...
Great. So you DENY gay marriage activists the right to use the 10th to promote faggotry in states like Massachesetts. That’s not a libertarian viewpoint, but I applaud you for thinking conservatively.
Now. What do you have against the government (state or FedGov) endorsing, supporting and promoting traditional marriages? Take away any and all religious aspects of marriage and you still have an ECONOMIC reason for the government to promote marriage. Marriages have been the backbone of a healthy society for hundreds of centuries. And we can easily see - since LBJ and his Great Society programs - what a systematic government endorsed destruction of marriage has done to our society.
Yet you advocate for the government to abandon “the “license” route”?
Wow. You must really love the results of that abandonment - the Welfare State.