Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
It should prohibit intentionally (deliberately) depositing seminal fluid anywhere but in one's lawful wife's vagina, but it did not.

Good luck getting such a law passed. There's not one state legislature anywhere in the U.S. that would pass such a law.

24 posted on 03/05/2013 10:31:30 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian
You're probably right about that, LL, for sure ---but it would be justified, I would argue, by legitimate public policy aims: the stabilization of the natural family unit and the human rights which flow therefrom, and the eradication of preventable public health threats.

I guess we'll have to collapse utterly into disease and sexual disintegration, before we get the point.

25 posted on 03/05/2013 10:52:01 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Make love. Accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Mrs. Don-o
"It should prohibit intentionally (deliberately) depositing seminal fluid anywhere but in one's lawful wife's vagina, but it did not."

Good luck getting such a law passed. There's not one state legislature anywhere in the U.S. that would pass such a law.


Nor should they; I don't want any state legislature telling married couples what they can do in bed.
26 posted on 03/05/2013 5:56:01 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson