Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
It banned oral and anal sex only between same-sex couples. Therefore, it did discriminate against gays.

How does one identify the 'gay' beings you refer to? It would be pretty hard to enforce such a law. I always thought laws were made in regards to actions and not a supposed state of being ESPECIALLY one that is subjective and ONLY self declared.

The law could not have discriminated --I would grant you that the homosexually disordered may have been, as the one would say, 'unfairly' targeted -much like the other minorities the community organizer rallies.

I think you have been drinking a bit too much leftist koolaid. Then again, it may just be a libertarian thing...

28 posted on 03/05/2013 6:14:35 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers
The law could not have discriminated --I would grant you that the homosexually disordered may have been, as the one would say, 'unfairly' targeted -much like the other minorities the community organizer rallies. I think you have been drinking a bit too much leftist koolaid. Then again, it may just be a libertarian thing...

The law banned oral and anal sex between two people of the same gender, but not oral and anal sex between two people of opposite genders. I was responding to another poster who claimed the law was not discriminatory because it banned sodomy by everyone, which it did not.

34 posted on 03/06/2013 8:22:15 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson