Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Anyone with some naval expertise know what this means - can the Soviets do it; will the subs be any good; how does this affect the US while Obama is dithering away our leadership in world military affairs?


2 posted on 03/06/2013 12:42:08 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Hammer

>>Anyone with some naval expertise know what this means - can the Soviets do it; will the subs be any good; how does this affect the US while Obama is dithering away our leadership in world military affairs?<<

Titanium hull is an incredible waste of money in the first place. I think a single sub like that cost in a range of Space Shuttle. Thus, it seems like they already have it. Titanium isn’t about to deteriorate to corrosion so it is quite possible it these hulls are in a good shape. Pros: they are strong and can dive much deeper than conventional subs (3 to 4 times deeper than Ohio-class), they have little magnetic signature. They could be a good subs if filled with silent powerplant and modern equipment.


5 posted on 03/06/2013 1:09:18 AM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Hammer

Sure. It means my TaylorMade driver will cost more now.


7 posted on 03/06/2013 2:51:37 AM PST by Makana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson