Posted on 03/09/2013 1:12:13 AM PST by Kaslin
I could vote for Rand Paul if he decides to run in 2016. At least in the primary
McCain is the like the family patriarch of a rich family who has been hoarding the family’s riches from generations of accumulations, keeping them from going to the rightful inheritors, and reserving them for his favorite child (Graham), the spoiled, little brat, who’s never done anything meaningful other than follow daddy’s orders. The rest of the Republican Party represent the rest of the family, expected to toe the line and not make waves if they want to continue to get their piddly monthly subsistence, or they’ll be kicked out of the family.
This seems to be the entire article. I can not find a longer version of it
I’m not leaving before I put a burning paper bag of dog poop on his front porch!!!
Hehehe, I’ll show him!!!
Who’s going to ring the doorbell???
I’d like to have my dog take one giant, stinking ‘0bama’ on McLame’s lawn, and then have Light in the Loafers Lindsey step in it!
That in itself is the prime illustration of who is farther left, as well as who has the tendency to use Alinskyite tactics.
Much ado about nothing... the Progressives have not suitcase-NUKED an America City ...
((( YET! )))... i.e. by foreign or domestic operatives.. or both..
They are not ready YET, but may be soon..
Stampeding Sheep is WHAT THEY DO..
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Rand Paul and the Rest of You Damn Conservatives Need to Get Off John McCain’s Lawn!, Kaslin wrote:
This seems to be the entire article. I can not find a longer version of it
It was edited before you got it.
Couldn't have planned it better! Perfect storm.
BTW, nobody cares what McCain and Graham think! They have had a hand in the mess we're in...a heavy hand!
The following is from the site
My latest Townhall column is called, Rand Paul and the Rest of You Damn Conservatives Need to Get Off John McCain’s Lawn!. Here’s an excerpt from the column.
I asked the president, can you kill an American on American soil, it should have been an easy answer. Its an easy question. It should have been a resounding, an unequivocal, No. The presidents response? He hasnt killed anyone yet. — Rand Paul
I do not believe that question deserves an answer. — Lindsey Graham
Mr. Holders letter answers Mr. Rands question, Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill Americans not engaged in combat on U.S. soil. The answer to that question is ‘no.– Jay Carney
I dont think that what happened yesterday is helpful to the American people. — John McCain
Poor, poor John McCain and Lindsey Graham. Here they were discussing new tax hikes and amnesty with Barack Obama over a sumptuous dinner and that rakish scamp Rand Paul made it impossible for them to enjoy the fine cuisine.
It was bad enough that he was picking a public fight with Barack Obama, but that scalawag actually confronted Obama over a constitutional issue! Didn’t he understand that just isn’t done in Washington?
Once again, you can read it all here
As you can see his link goes directly to his article in Townhall.com
I can not find any other link. If you have one, I'd appreciate it if you would post it
Very well said
I allways felt anything I posted here never gets read and as many times as I’ve seen your postings it never occured to me you were one of those. How about reading what I originally wrote?
Never commented or inferred there was another article or another source.I may have inferred (1000 words) that what Hawkins reported on was nothing anybody else of a conservative stripe was also saying but certainly did not attack it.
My comment was what Rand really accomplished was he took the focus away from that collaboration dinner and I cited Limbaugh reaction by McCain and Lindsey as having a hissyfit because it took attention away from them having their Vichyssoise with Our Fearless Leader.
In doing so Rand shut down what would have been the whole campaign of bi-partisan cooperation that would have been shoved down conservatives throats.
While I did not conclude my response expressing it that way I certainly left that conclusion. Which by the way wasn’t the conclusion Hawkins came up with..
My reply to John Hawkins : John, go fornicate with yourself.
Not to worry, Rand Paul will be made "damaged goods", as you call it, in no time. How do good people become "damaged goods" in our best of all possible worlds?
I promise, too, that tomorrow's Sunday morning talking heads will either ignore Rand Paul entirely, or they will play the Alinsky card - dragging out everything from UFOS and bigfoot to Hitler to try to smeat and ridicule him. I doubt they'll invite him on and let him speak for himself though. He would Newt-er them in debate.
That , My FRiend, will never happen. He was re-elected to another term in 2010 I believe. He had primary opposition and defeated said opponent. For some unknown reason, the people of Arizona love him.
“Just curious as to where you went that is any less socialist than America?”
_________________________________________________
I did not find so much socialism even in Slovakia, where I lived before moving to the Philippines, where there is little or no Socialism.
Obumbo, however, wants a USSA, and half of the population there, all idiots, seem to agree.
He’ll be 80 in 2016 when he is up for reelection
Huh? Why would you say such a thing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.