Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hummingbird

Well, it’s hard to argue in favor of the constitutionality of domestic drone strikes against citizens who are not committing a crime. It was an outrageous example, made all the more so by the administration’s hesitance to answer. On the merits there was no way Rand could lose.


18 posted on 03/09/2013 1:38:38 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: cdcdawg

“Well, it’s hard to argue in favor of the constitutionality of domestic drone strikes against citizens who are not committing a crime. It was an outrageous example, made all the more so by the administration’s hesitance to answer. On the merits there was no way Rand could lose.”

And yet, how few spoke up as passionately as Senators Paul & Cruz for most of the day- and there were actually Republican Senators who bashed them for it.
We all know what should have, unanimously, happened- at least as it concerns those on the right side of the aisle. It didn’t.
Brennan should not have been confirmed.
Holder’s “concession” isn’t worth the paper it was written on.


19 posted on 03/09/2013 1:53:21 PM PST by KGeorge (hoplophobia: n. irrational, morbid fear of guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson