Incorrect. For even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.
However, even the quality of being absolutely worthless has a worth: One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject.
Ergo, even the absolutely worthless has worth.
Meaning it is not absolutely worthless.
Making the original premise: "One can deduce what absolute worthlessness looks like from observing the subject," meaningless.
Meaning that the subject IS in fact worthless.......
Well jousted, Sir Lazamataz.