Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Higgs Boson Positively Identified
ScienceNOW ^ | 14 March 2013 | Adrian Cho

Posted on 03/15/2013 12:12:53 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: FreedomStar3028

Not quite it. This is why they are (in a preliminary fashion) calling it “a” Higgs Boson (possibly).


21 posted on 03/15/2013 6:55:00 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides

Painkillers mobilize blood stem cells

Blood test tracks cancer

Sticky problem snares wonder material - Graphene-like form of silicon proves hard to handle.

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

22 posted on 03/15/2013 9:29:14 AM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seowulf
This is Sheldon's worst nightmare.

He's a string theory geek.

String theory: It's not even wrong!

23 posted on 03/15/2013 9:48:07 AM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

It’s a pretty big deal when a theory predicts something that has never previously been observed. Then, once you know what the theory predicts, you go out, look for it, and find it.

Einstein predicting that gravity would bend light, which turned out to be true when tested was a big deal. So is this. The standard model, as gawky and ad hoc as it seems, makes good predictions of things we have never seen before and has done so pretty consistently.


24 posted on 03/17/2013 12:23:32 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Yes, I know this. I was posting in response to someone that asked “How do they know it’s the Higgs-Boson?”


25 posted on 03/17/2013 12:33:03 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
How could they be certain it’s the Higgs Boson

While they can't be 100% certain, it's "signature" is just what was predicted by theoretical considerations for the Higgs.

26 posted on 03/18/2013 8:14:19 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: soycd
Now they can get to work on explaining what sub particles make up a boson.

Perhaps, and perhaps it's really "basic" particle, like the various quarks, and leptons.


27 posted on 03/18/2013 8:20:55 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Considering the fact that we have not been able to observe anything beyond our universe or anything smaller than the elementary particles, we can’t see the bigger or smaller picture.

Infinity leaves a lot of room for improvement.


28 posted on 03/19/2013 3:58:13 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Beyond Einstein’s Horizon

To sciencenews.org, re
“Study of energy waves formed during the Big Bang supports Einstein’s prediction that a strange, invisible force is pushing the universe apart”
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/340163/title/FOR_KIDS_%E2%80%98Ruler%E2%80%99_to_measure_space

A. From Universe-Energy-Mass-Life Compilation
http://universe-life.com/2012/02/03/universe-energy-mass-life-compilation/

From the Big-Bang it is a rationally commonsensical conjecture that the gravitons, the smallest base primal particles of the universe, must be both mass and energy, i.e. inert mass yet in motion even at the briefest fraction of a second of the pre Big Bang singularity. This is rationally commonsensical since otherwise the Big would not have Banged, the superposition of mass and energy would not have been resolved.
The universe originates, derives and evolves from this energy-mass dualism which is possible and probable due to the small size of the gravitons.
Since gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion to mass and energy is mass in motion, gravity is the force exerted between mass formats.
All the matter of the universe is a progeny of the gravitons evolutions, of the natural selection of mass, of some of the mass formats attaining temporary augmented energy constraint in their successive generations, with energy drained from other mass formats, to temporarily postpone, survive, the reversion of their own constitutional mass to the pool of cosmic energy fueling the galactic clusters expansion set in motion by the Big Bang.

B. From: 21st century science whence and whither
http://universe-life.com/2011/12/13/21st-century-science-whence-and-whither/

1. Dark energy and matter YOK. Per E=Total[m(1 + D)] all the energy and matter of the universe are accounted for.
Adopt space mass distance concept, constant rate mass-to-energy reconversion.

2. Higgs Particle YOK. Mass forms below some value of the above D. All mass formats evolve from the gravitons.

3. Galactic clusters formed by conglomeration?
No. Galactic clusters formed by Big-Bang’s fragments dispersion, evidenced by their Newtonian behavior including their separation acceleration.

4. The universe expansion is fueled by the mass-to-energy constant rate reconversion. Eventually, as expansion will slow down, will run out of massfuel, gravity will overcome expansion and initiate empansion back to singularity. The universe is a cyclic array of energy-mass dualism, between nearly all-energy and all-mass poles, under omnipresent gravity. Gravity is the monotheism and re-genesis of the universe.

Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/
-The Genome is a base organism evolved, and continuously modified, by the genes of its higher organism as their functional template.
-The 20yrs development, and comprehensive data-based scientism worldview, in a succinct format.

PS: For sciencenews is “Jewish” a taboo adjective? DH


29 posted on 06/20/2013 11:31:56 AM PDT by Dov Henis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soycd

Excellent, excellent response!!!


30 posted on 06/20/2013 11:36:33 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

31 posted on 06/20/2013 11:39:19 AM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson