Skip to comments.The Real Cost of Obama: $19 Trillion
Posted on 03/15/2013 4:58:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
There's a super storm raging over our economy that's been seeded and fueled by the federal government over a period of the past several decades. And it's literally costing the country trillions of dollars in GDP per year. Its not merely garden-variety government waste that's the problem either. It's monumental stupidity by the government, combined with venial cupidity by voters who think they can get others to pay for their free lunch.
This government-created storm has, more than any other factor, contributed to the fiscal crisis; a crisis that is creating more expansive government programs, robbing us of more GDP, thus ensuring the political class will take more actions that punish the most productive and dynamic elements of our society.
You know? The people who create economic growth?
In order to understand how this storm is being fed, you need only consult some official government figures. The labor participation rates released recently by the Bureau of Labor Statistics now stands at 63.6, near Carter-recession levels.
According to policy scholar and historian, Professor Richard Vedder of Ohio University, that means as many as 14 million of people are officially out of the labor pool. And the professor from Ohio says it's the government's own unemployment program that's helping to reduce the number of bodies willing to work.
If you give people money to not work, says Vedder, some people will say Gee thats a pretty good option. There have been a lot of studies over the years going back to the 1970s that show these programs on balance added a bit to the unemployment rate.
Because unemployment compensation has lasted so long, however, unemployment rates have gone up a couple of percentage points from where it would otherwise be.
Vedder's back-of-the-envelope calculations that he shared with me says that those missing workers could be costing the economy as much as $800 billion in GDP per year. Thats $2500 for every person, or $10,000 for every family in GDP he says.
But that's not all: Multiplied and compounded over 10 years, that's not $8 trillion missing from the economy, but rather $9 trillion.
If you want to know why we have an entitlement crisis, why some cities, like Detroit, can't afford to pay for basic services or why teacher pension plans have to cut back benefits, it's not because tax rates are too low, or spending has been cut to the bone. It's because politicians have made off with $9 trillion from our GDP. That's not just missing GDP, you see; it's missing payroll taxes, income taxes, sales taxes and teacher pension contributions.
While our political and cultural elite like to pretend that there is a settled science that supports the notion that government creates "revenue by Acts of Congress and the generosity of the Executive Office, once again they have it exactly backwards: All public revenues first start out as private money in the economy. When that money is missing from the private sector, it can never afterward make its way to the public sector.
Now here's the bad news: Labor participation rates, and the effect they have on GDP, are just long spring showers that someday will end compared to the storm created by the regulatory burden in the country. According to a report in 2011 by the Heritage Foundation, the government's own Small Business Administration estimates that compliance with various federal regulatory structures cost the economy another $1.75 trillion every year. And that's before we even account for the costs of Obamacare and Dodd-Frank financial "reform" - both of which appear to have higher price tags than originally touted.
While we will never have a regulation-free government- nor should we- it bears asking how long we can afford to pay 13 percent of our GDP to comply with federal mandates, over and above taxes that we pay to support basic services like the common defense.
Because doing my own back-of-the-envelope calculation says that by cutting regulatory costs to half of what they are currently means we can add another $9.8 trillion in GDP as well. If we combine that growth with policies that encourage employment, we can add $19 trillion to GDP over ten years.
$19 trillion could go very far toward righting our fiscal ship even as the fiscal storm continues.
Because the fiscal storm that we see happening in western, industrialized counties isn't just fiscal, it's also demographic. With aging populations and near zero internal birth rates, we can no longer rely, as we once did, on a riding tide of population to lift all boats in our economy.
We need to get back the private GDP that politicians today are so happily squandering through myriad government schemes like Sarbanes-Oxley or emergency unemployment benefits. Since its unrealistic to expect politicians to make meaningful cuts in government spending, we have to reduce the burden of government- over 40 percent of our GDP in 2013- by growing the private sector more rapidly.
Or we risk being swamped in the face of this man-caused, government sponsored super storm.
that’s enough to give every man, woman, and child $63,000 each
where the hell is all this money going?
Let's see......Muslim hellholes, corrupt politician's freezers and mattresses, Michelle Obama's never-ending vacations, Barack's crooked relatives back home in Kenya, Union coffers, the Clintons, the U.N., Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood.
The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.
I think that one perspective is the Federal Government has become a liability to the Union of the States opposed to the managing entity of the Union it was designed to be.
We need representative government back.
NO we don’t. (to those that say we still have representative government) NOT when those so called “representatives” flip us the wee birdie often, and get away with it.
“where the hell is all this money going?”
I think his point is that it’s not being created to begin with. The true cost of 0bamunism is that it destroys the incentive to work and produce.
Words can not describe how much I despise this son of a bitch.
>only difference between flash mob ‘urban yutes’ and U.S. politicians is the hoodies<
Now that is truly tag line material. Good on you
And you can bet he’s not done spending yet. He believes Washington doesn’t have a spending problem. As do his fellow rats in the House and the Senate.
Not only do I despise that arrogant pos, I also despise every liberal
And that's just in greens fees.
Thank you......I’m changing my tagline now.
The worst part is that they have absolutely NOTHING to so for it.