Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: smoothsailing
2 posted on
03/16/2013 5:12:22 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
To: smoothsailing
These studies are going to make a whole lot of Obama’s friends rich.
It’s all about the money.
3 posted on
03/16/2013 5:13:04 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: smoothsailing
Deciding whether to approve the Keystone XL pipeline is surely one of the toughest challenges of Barack Obamas presidency. How can anyone be so pathetically stupid to write such a sentence?
How can a U.S. President be so bitterly destructive to decide against such a project?
To: smoothsailing
An honest study of Keystone and GW would be that it would be worse if we did not build the pipeline since the oil would have to be transported to the West coast then to China to fuel their industrial expansion.
6 posted on
03/16/2013 5:17:20 PM PDT by
AU72
To: smoothsailing
People may eventually catch onto this anti-American commie.
To: smoothsailing
Glabull-Crap Warning. Huge numbers of scientists have jumped off that wagon... the evidence is overwhelming- manmade climate change is bunk...
But that doesn’t help their globalist, Marxist agenda...
9 posted on
03/16/2013 5:19:26 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
To: smoothsailing
Will it harm America?
Then he did it.
EVERYTHING he does either:
A) Weakens America
B) Distances America's allies
C) Strengthens America's enemies
D) Serves Islam
E) Harms Israel
Or some combination of the above.
10 posted on
03/16/2013 5:19:44 PM PDT by
null and void
(If the government is so worried about civil disturbance, why are they working so hard to disturb us?)
To: smoothsailing
I guess China needs Alberta’s bitumen than you guys.
11 posted on
03/16/2013 5:22:03 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: smoothsailing
Is he a two-faced weasel?
12 posted on
03/16/2013 5:23:02 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: smoothsailing
"Obama administration is preparing to tell all federal agencies for the first time that they should consider the impact on global warming before approving major projects.
C.Y.A.
To: smoothsailing
Not only would it mollify the left it would mollify the two opposing factions of the left, the enviro-nazis and the unions.
The turkey is good at figuring out a way to appease those who support him.
14 posted on
03/16/2013 5:23:42 PM PDT by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: smoothsailing
you don’t allow things that would boost the economy when you’re orchestrating it’s collapse.
21 posted on
03/16/2013 5:36:46 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: smoothsailing
BUILD IT ANYWAY. Who the hell gave the King the authority to stop it, anyway? Eff him. Proceed with construction and let the military or Feds come out to try and stop it. That’s when we stand with the builders. Bring it on.
To: smoothsailing
Dumb azz 0bama has taken over 1,600 days to make a decision. That’s well over 3 years. What a joke. He’s gotten away with voting ‘present’ so far.
To: smoothsailing
the Obama administration is preparing to tell all federal agencies for the first time that they should consider the impact on global warming before approving major projects. Considering that "global warming" is itself a fraud, this is like asking how something will affect unicorns.
Be that as it may, the effect of this oil on the environment is moot. The oil will be processed and burned in the US, or it will be processed and burned in China. Either way it will be processed and burned.
Shipping it by pipeline is less risk to the environment than shipping it by sea. And you consume less energy getting it to market than you do shipping by sea. So if you care about the environment, Keystone is the better answer than the alternative.
Its funny, simple economics usually leads you to the more economically efficient answer, which is usually the more environmentally efficient answer.
25 posted on
03/16/2013 5:44:04 PM PDT by
marron
To: smoothsailing
To: smoothsailing
It shouldn’t be up to this bought and paid for a-hole!
29 posted on
03/16/2013 6:03:17 PM PDT by
Aria
( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
To: smoothsailing
Jarret, Ayers and the rest of the crew are still trying to figure out how to maximize total profits on this latest scam, that’s all....
30 posted on
03/16/2013 6:19:04 PM PDT by
mowowie
To: smoothsailing
...the Obama dumBO administration is preparing to tell all federal agencies for the first time that they should consider the impact on global warming before approving major projects. That's easy, there is none.
32 posted on
03/16/2013 6:25:55 PM PDT by
depressed in 06
(America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
To: smoothsailing
and America takes another one in the........
33 posted on
03/16/2013 6:46:54 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson