if you would have read further down the thread you’d have gotten what i said.
libtards always try to have more than one way to get what they want. they are masters of incrementalism and the dialectic, and also the deplhi technique. they play us for suckers all the time.
the point was, even if she didn’t get the bill out there, and even if the amendment will go down on its own, they already have another way being trial-ballooned and that is to tax every component of firearm usage - gun, ammo, mags, etc, into a punitive and prohibitive range with severe penalties not paying the taxes, less and less people will own guns.
they like to appear like they’ve lost, or they are really compromising, when their fallback position was what they wanted to get done all along. it catches us offguard and the rinos always buy it.
i was not saying it’s hopeless. you may want to spend more time reading my comments, you really don’t know me that well.
Further down in the thread? Well, then don't castigate me for reading your earlier post, as stated. You could have explained yourself in your first reply to me.
you may want to spend more time reading my comments, you really don’t know me that well.
Well, isn't that big of you. Pardon, friend, but folks are going to comment on what you say around here, so the onus is on you to say what you mean the first time.