Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeandfreezing

“Government has no interest in promoting a stable society?”

The person who defines the meaning of the terms gets to control the outcome of the debate. With 74% of black children being born to an unmarried mother, what is “stability” in this context? Nine out of ten young black men who are murdered die at the hands of another back man.

Indeed, one third of all black males who dropped out of high school are in prison, where society is stable.

Clearly for this demographic, they are going their own way and the fruits are horrible. They clearly don’t care about the institution of marriage. They seemingly have an inverted relationship to it compared to the homosexual demographic. But in the end the result is the same: the institution of marriage is destroyed. Maybe that is the higher goal all along.


70 posted on 03/20/2013 8:43:49 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: theBuckwheat

Many would say that the “social safety net” has no influence on marriage,

but those who actually examine the issue know that it indeed does, as you point out with the bastardity rate among the welfare class.

Yes, their goal is pretty clear - destroying marriage.
Homos “marrying” doesn’t “expand” the freedom, it just destroys the institution as it exists and makes it meaningless.


72 posted on 03/20/2013 8:46:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson