Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

The “war” itself was a huge success. The rebuilding mire after not so much.

It should be noted that in World War One the allies took that many casualties in hours. The Vietnam total in not more than two days.


2 posted on 03/20/2013 8:27:42 PM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheRhinelander

I don’t understand your logic. War is not fought for the sake of war. Saying the war itself was a success without regard to whether we’re better or worse off having fought it is as if my construction company built a house that collapsed on its residents, and I responded with, “Well, the building part was successful. We got it up there. Whether or not it crushed a family to death down the road is another matter.”


8 posted on 03/20/2013 8:49:00 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TheRhinelander

It should be noted that electing Dinkens as mayor of New York City cost more lives than that. heck, The difference between Dinkins and Giuliani was more than that.


20 posted on 03/20/2013 10:18:40 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson