Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

In Kansas, until recently, the funding for the child protective agency was based on caseload.

It incentivized the agents to find ‘violations’ where there weren’t any.


51 posted on 03/21/2013 6:52:03 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew
Even where it doesn't specifically work that way, it does. If there is a large enough caseload, there is opportunity for promotion as new hires are added on. Not to mention all the 'counseling money' when those who can afford it (not on welfare) are told they have to attend anything form anger management to parenting classes and are told they will be footing the bill.

Another trick is to take the child to dentist, doctors, etc. and then charge the parents for the costs. If child support is involved, they'll take the money for all the programs and diagnoses from the check, which passes through the Social Services hands first.

The list goes on, but there is a scatload of opportunity for abuse of the virtually limitless power there, and that does happen.

53 posted on 03/21/2013 6:57:45 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson