And how is it that attack hack Sid Blumenthal has "sources" high in the Libyan government as well as "the highest levels of European governments and Western Intelligence and security services"?
How is it that Sid's "sources" have anything to add the Secretary of State's own sources in these very institutions?
Why is Sid reporting to Hillary as an intelligence gatherer, rather than advising her on her political situation -- which is his area of expertise?
Why is there nothing sensitive or previously unknown (or imponderable) in these communications? Nothing that "clears" Hillary or "implicates" another party?
More questions than answers...
How is it that Sid's "sources" have anything to add the Secretary of State's own sources in these very institutions?
Why is Sid reporting to Hillary as an intelligence gatherer, rather than advising her on her political situation -- which is his area of expertise?
Why is there nothing sensitive or previously unknown (or imponderable) in these communications? Nothing that "clears" Hillary or "implicates" another party?
More really excellent questions. Especially the first one.