Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldironsides
I don’t know why the airport never did succeed...

Because it is at a relatively high altitude, and thus, when everywhere else is VFR... Worcester is marginal or IFR, with its runways jutting into a cloud.

The earlier comment about flight plan filing is easy, drop in the mail is correct... if by that you mean e-mail...

To enter a flight plan, its as easy as pressing one key on an IPAD. To pick up or start a flight plan is easy as well... depart VFR if possible and radio in the air.... or a 2 minute (usually) phone call.

29 posted on 03/23/2013 9:54:27 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

The only possible negative, among all the positives, of these closures is that some instrument approaches might change for the worse (ie, higher minimums). Due to being a non-tower, I’d surmise the procedures to getting a local barometric pressure might be a bit more remote, resulting in procedure changes... but this is so insignificant, compared to the savings of tax dollars.


31 posted on 03/23/2013 9:57:55 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson