The bottom line is that Homosexual Scoutmasters make as much sense as waving a burning firebrand in a powder magazine: no good can come of it.
Freedom of association has been completely obfusticated by the cries of abuse and bigotry, but the government has no place telling private individuals or organizations who to associate with, who to let in or who they can't kick out.
Attacking the people who say that loudest (That Government should just butt out) and then inextricably associating them with the LIBERTINES (who, independent of political party, might share some of that philosophy on very limited government involvement in private matters for their own reasons) is not only wrong, it alienates the very sort of people who believe that limited government is best.
When someone says straight out that they are libertarians, then they are just that.
Conservatives need to learn what libertarianism is, and what it exists to advance, and why it is that those people don’t merely call themselves conservatives, and can’t, and people need to learn that the homosexual agenda and abortion and open borders and more, is a fundamental part of libertarianism, the actual primary agenda and without question, the one part of the libertarian agenda that advances and succeeds most easily as rinos and even democrats embrace the word to be able to say how they personally don’t like something, but that they take a “libertarian” view.