f the courts do not act responsibly, especially the SCOTUS, and either support Team Obama, or those opposed on eligibility, the only recourse left would be acquiescence, or rebellion. Within the time left for the second term, the ruling need not even address Obama, but such doubts about the next round of candidates can not remain. The qualifications of the next round of candidates will be studied and ruled upon by the voters and their electors in 2016. In 57 straight presidential elections, voters/electors have approved the qualifications of every president who has been elected. Never has the Supreme Court ever even hinted that it would ever attempt to seize the power to overturn a decision rendered by voters/electors regarding a candidate's qualifications.
Trust God, the voters and their electors. Defend our Constitution from the crackpot statists who would, if permitted, impose a judicial tyranny on America.
American history has shown time and again that the Lord cares deeply about this nation. May He continue to guide us and may He continue to grant us the strength and wisdom to accept cheerfully His will as he continues to reveal it to us.
Others may disagree, but I place our Lord above us all, including the Supreme Court. I trust that God will continue to guide our people and continue to protect the sovereignty of the People of the United States. I pray that the Supreme Court will never attempt to come between our Lord and our good people.
Never has the Supreme Court ever even hinted that it would ever attempt to seize the power to overturn a decision rendered by voters/electors regarding a candidate's qualifications. Thanks for that thought. It helped me clarify (I think) what has been in the back of my mind ever since this eligibility issue surfaced. I.E., this CANNOT be just about Obama, or anyone actually occupying the office. The time for challenges is, as it always has been for every elected office, during the candidacy. Unqualified office holders have been removed after election, but very rarely, and never by the SCOTUS.
There then is the problem for a very considerable number of Americans, myself included, who think Obama was ineligible to run for the office. I would like to think the SCOTUS has the same qualms and is therefore waiting to rule on eligibility for a candidate, rather than a sitting President, no matter the lack of bona fides.
Of course, this has nothing to do with various items of Obama's documentation. There is sufficient reason to suspect they are forgeries. That is another matter and really ought not come as surprise to anyone familiar with the man's surrender of his law license rather than face a Bar Hearing. It has always astounded me that this has never been even looked at by the MSM. His legal career ended during his first and only (1)case, during which opposing attorneys noted wild discrepancies between his "autobiography" and his Bar Application, which at the time was easily accessible on line at the web site of the Illinois Bar, and in which he denied "use of an alias," "drug use," and "traffic violations.". No one thinks it odd that BOTH the President and his wife were removed from the Illinois Bar, asked in his case, and court-ordered in hers?