[Tau Food]

For 57 straight presidential elections, we have followed the Constitution and in each case, the voters and their electors examined, considered and approved the qualifications of all successful presidential candidates. That tradition will be followed again in 2016 because that is the procedure prescribed by the Constitution.

This is the time to defend our Constitution; it is not the time to be searching for ways to attempt to further empower elitist, unelected judges.

[noinfringers2]

I didn’t see the most important of action’s i.e verify given. The past elections might demonstrate those criterion that you listed but as to cases like Obama these alone do not encompass a valid eligibility. An ‘examination’ can be faulty or colored, a ‘consideration’ can be shallow or misdirected, and ‘approval’ can be bought or forged and I can agree all three point words apply to Obama. ‘Verify’ was certainly missing.