Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State grants Secret Service vast new powers (Colorado)
wnd ^ | March 29, 2013 3 hours ago | Jack Minor

Posted on 03/29/2013 8:45:49 PM PDT by Red Steel

Soon will be able to enforce Obama gun laws without sheriffs' help

A bill is heading to Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper’s desk that Republican lawmakers say would give members of the Secret Service broad arrest powers in the state and could provide a framework for federal agents eventually to enforce gun restrictions.

“This is absolutely insane,” Rep. Lori Saine, R-Dacono, said. “In theory if a Secret Service agent is in a county where the sheriff has refused to enforce some of the recent unenforceable gun laws, the agent could arrest an individual if he believes the law has been broken.”

The idea actually aligns with an Obama agenda to create vast new restrictions and regulations on guns. WND has reported that hundreds of sheriffs nationwide, including many in Colorado, have said they cannot enforce federal restrictions that would violate the Second Amendment.

In Colorado, Weld County Sheriff John Cooke said he and many other county sheriffs “won’t bother” with several laws poised to go into effect in Colorado because they would be impossible to enforce.

One of the laws would require private sellers to do a background check on purchasers in private gun transaction, but the sheriffs wonder how to keep track of whether gun owners are meeting the new requirements.

-snip-

The new bill regarding the Secret Service, SB-13-013, passed on a nearly party line vote in the Democrat-controlled House and is now awaiting the governor’s signature. The bill grants members of the Secret Service arrest powers by considering them to be a peace officer, putting them on a par with state law-enforcement officials with respect to arrest authority.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloomberg; donutwatch; guncontrol; infiltrated; ngos; openbordersresult; secondamendment; secretservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: hadaclueonce
Secret Service? WTH? State Laws? I don’t think that is in their duties.

Will every agent be required to memorize all of the statutes of all the states?

41 posted on 03/29/2013 9:51:30 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This idea didn’t come from the local level in Colorado, I’ll wager. This is Eric Holder, Jim Messina or David Axelrod level thinking.

Governor Hickenhooper will jump on command and do anything they want, one of the most true_beliver Democrat operatives in America

42 posted on 03/29/2013 9:53:38 PM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing--- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Read the article. This is really sinister - typical dhimmicrat lies and obfuscations. It makes no sense. It makes me think that the crazy booger eater joe biden is involved somehow.


43 posted on 03/29/2013 9:54:20 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"This idea didn’t come from the local level in Colorado, I’ll wager. This is Eric Holder, Jim Messina or David Axelrod level thinking."

Yes, likely so, and it goes above the current thinking in the Secret Service as we see here.

the Secret Service told him their current policies would prohibit them from arresting Colorado citizens under the bill’s provisions.“They told Jared that making an arrest of a Colorado citizen for a misdemeanor crime unrelated to their own duties would actually violate their own guidelines,

"Guidelines" and "current policies" are very easy to change. Obama can change them in a DC minute.

44 posted on 03/29/2013 9:58:32 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

I am just saying that the US Secret Service would be a long way outside their jurisdiction to be enforcing a State law.


45 posted on 03/29/2013 9:59:54 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (Forget Mexico. Put the border fence around California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kitchen
bump
46 posted on 03/29/2013 10:00:48 PM PDT by kitchen (Due to the increased price of ammo, do not expect a warning shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
 photo 3x5COMMIECOLORADOTYRANTFLAG_zps30f85d31.jpg
47 posted on 03/29/2013 10:01:50 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government shoud fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The Secret Service budget is controlled by Congress. They can restrict the functions to only protecting the president and financial crimes, which is only what they are allowed to do anyway.


48 posted on 03/29/2013 10:02:00 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

I completely agree with you. I think the idea is ridiculous.

I guess they’ll be programmed with one primary directive: disarm the citizens.


49 posted on 03/29/2013 10:03:50 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

The democratic party in Colorado is an extremely well-funded and well oiled machine able to take advantage of racist politics to polarize a increasingly minority demographic into abandoning their money and rights in the name of fear.

If the people of Colorado are not shocked back in to their senses by this madness than I should declare the State and its remaining people dammed.


50 posted on 03/29/2013 10:14:04 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Funny that the first agency they thought of wasn't the FBI, TSA, FEMA, US Marshall’s Service or ATF, but an organization that shares initials with Heinrich Himmler's omnipresent force in Nazi Germany, huh?
51 posted on 03/29/2013 10:19:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Are they talking about federal agents enforcing federal law within CO's borders? Or is this about federal agents enforcing CO gun laws?

It must be the former. If that's so, then I fail to see what this law changes. Feds have always had power to enforce federal law, despite what state law says.

Can someone explain this?

52 posted on 03/29/2013 10:33:50 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

but an organization that shares initials with Heinrich Himmler’s omnipresent force in Nazi Germany, huh?

It is surprising, given that the TSA actually DOES resemble Himmler’s organization in many of its methods;)


53 posted on 03/29/2013 10:33:56 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Kind of ironic that the Secret Services initials are ‘SS’


54 posted on 03/29/2013 10:37:14 PM PDT by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

I thought they dealt mostly with counterfeiting? Good luck with that, there probably aren’t that many agents in the state.


55 posted on 03/29/2013 10:40:30 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

“Will every agent be required to memorize all of the statutes of all the states?”

No but they will be required to memorize every underground bordellos (except Navada) in all 57 states. =)


56 posted on 03/29/2013 10:42:11 PM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Texas scares me. If we lose Texas, it’s very bad.”

A lot of us in Texas are really frightened. We live out in the County and I asked our local Sheriff if he was going to sign the petition with other sheriff’s who won’t enforce federal gun laws. His response, “I’m thinking on it”. Told him not good enough. He either was or he wasn’t and it’s time to pick a side.

He has always run unopposed but understand he may have a tough young gun running against him next time.


57 posted on 03/29/2013 10:52:09 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: laplata

No one has higher legal authority than a sheriff in his juresdiction.


Yah,I used to belief that pap too.


58 posted on 03/29/2013 10:58:53 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 ("Line; meet Sand".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

He has always run unopposed but understand he may have a tough young gun running against him next time.


He’d better commit to upholding the Constitution or he’ll get fired. Pressure him declare his stance. The other candidate will pressure him.

Everyone needs to let their sheriff know that they support them and will stand with them when the time comes. we can’t leave them hanging.


59 posted on 03/29/2013 11:02:14 PM PDT by laplata (Peace Through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: S.O.S121.500

Look at Joe Arpillo. He’s standing up to the Feds.


60 posted on 03/29/2013 11:03:41 PM PDT by laplata (Peace Through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson