What often seems like a sure-fire idea, later backfires. This is a good example.
Duras is correct: there is a greater chance of mischief occurring contra the liberties espoused in our U.S.Constitution than any possibility of improving that governing document.
Adding more amendments to it will not improve government.
What is required is enforcement of the rule of law.
That can only be achieved by removing the present occupants of the White House. Adding amendments to the Constitution will achieve nothing!
Why not attend and make sure that does not happen?
“That can only be achieved by removing the present occupants of the White House.”
And, secondarily, trying any who were involved with them for the multiplicity of constitutional violations that they’ve made. I finally understand why when a new dictator takes over in some “banana republic,” that the first order of business it to “get rid of” the former leadership and it’s supporters. Somehow, when this country returns to it’s senses, some serious “housecleaning” must be one of the primary orders of business, starting with the “judiciary.” Because if we overlook that step, they will be back.
More Mischief that is already taking place in ignoring the Federal Constitution?
We must find a way to make the Federal Constitution enforceable against Washington.