Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monorprise; Secret Agent Man
I think we should refrain from discussing Civil War talk until nullification has failed to restore our rights.

Why?

Does the history of our very own Revolution and our founding fathers support that approach, or were they discussing amongst themselves and planning for war if every available means of resolving the issue peaceably failed?

I think history proves that they were working out the plans for rebellion and responding with force to force all along the way to the opening shots at Lexington and Concord.

They were prepared.
13 posted on 04/01/2013 6:20:12 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Then let us plain seriously for rebellion. Let us look at the state of assets at our disposal.

Let us look at the disposition of the Federal military assets, run assessments the likelihood of defection towards the cause of liberty and determine what we must do to increase the odds of Patriot success.

Let us talk practically about what would be required to secure our states from Federal tyranny.

I think you should find that Washington has indeed been busy over the last 150 years busy disarming our people and our states as to see to it that any future rebellion against their assumed absolute and unchecked athoirty whether it be legitimately grounded or otherwise should be overwhelmingly crushed.

Even if most men of the army should think the merits of the patriot cause worth fighting for, their very organization is designed to help prevent them from forming loyalty or kinship with any part of this federation so that they may be more easily in-mass preswaided to levy war upon their states. This is of course the very letter of treason in the now defuct Federal Constitution.

That was not a significant problem even in 1861 because the military’s command structure was easily and quickly replaced with one more agreeable to WHATEVER a president might want.

The sad truth is if we are even to talk about rebellion against a lawless Federal Government we must first talk about manuring that government towards collapse. For while it exist able to function it will not suffer our freedom to persist.

Short of that we must politically see to it that all other Americans are as unhappy with the union as we are while furthermore convincing them of of the benefits of going our separate ways, and he corresponding futility of agreeing upon and implementing a solution.

If it does however come down to a fight we must analyze our very limited options in winning that fight with respect to the technological and political tools at our disposal or which might be ceased in short enough order using what we do have.

This discussion-however should be somewhat more concealed, even thou there is an enormous variety of options


22 posted on 04/01/2013 8:05:26 PM PDT by Monorprise (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson