Connecticut gun ban signifies ‘new phase in history’

Examiner ^ | 4/3/13 | David Codrea

[Nachum]

“They tried to hide it, but we got access to it,” Rich Burgess, President of Connecticut Carry, wrote last night in an email to supporters. “Good to leak their plans far and wide, even though there is nothing likely to stop it at this point."

“It”?

“This is the working draft of the legislation that is to be voted on and signed into law tomorrow in Connecticut,” Burgess explained. “We are about to enter a new phase in history here.”

He’s right, and that realization is reflected by a CBS News report that “Customers packed gun stores around Connecticut on Tuesday ahead of a vote expected to bring sweeping changes to the state's gun control laws, including a ban on the sale of large-capacity ammunition magazines like the ones used in the Newtown shooting and a new classification for more than 100 types of guns as banned assault weapons.”

[MasterGunner01]

Never, ever, underestimate the stupidity of politicians. They will try the JBT route because these guys are on their payroll and they don't expect blow back. They shoot dogs all the time and get away with it. Why not the owners?

FedGov’s DHS is ordering desensitizing targets of women, elders, kids, pregnant women, and other white “domestic terrorists”; why wouldn't the state of CT or NY or MD or RI use their own employees to murder fellow Americans?

[kimtom]

“...Never, ever, underestimate the stupidity of politicians...”

Stalin, Hitler were not stupid, but Thugs still got into power.

I say piecemeal disarmament, after a catastrophe.

Unless, my believe is, the conserv. states begin standing up to unconstitutional laws. If the states (a few) stand together, mobility of enemy would be hindered.
Then maybe action.
and possibly foreign interference.

Hummmmmmm.......

[tomkat]

That.