Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"...President Obama then would be faced with making the war decision..."

Doubt if he has the cajones...

1 posted on 04/04/2013 11:40:47 AM PDT by illiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: illiac

I didn’t realize the Muslim Brotherhood was in Korea.


2 posted on 04/04/2013 11:42:10 AM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

If he did and we win he will win re election in 2016


3 posted on 04/04/2013 11:42:39 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

What about a regime change in the US?


4 posted on 04/04/2013 11:43:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
"U.S. would seek regime change in North Korea if attack occurs"

Fat lot of good that will do for the dead. Take the communist idiot out now!! (no, not that one).

5 posted on 04/04/2013 11:43:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
Doubt if he has the cajones...

You do?

6 posted on 04/04/2013 11:44:06 AM PDT by tsowellfan (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

No doubt in my mind. We have “sacklessjaweea” running round trying to disarm us law abiding victims. No time for Psy’s twin bro kim jong dung. Hell, we need regime (and I do mean “regime”)change right here at home. Maybe kim jong dung should have held dennis rodman for ransom.


8 posted on 04/04/2013 11:44:47 AM PDT by rktman (BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST MR. PRESIDENT!(not that we'd get the truth!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
Our Dear Leader's Leader would be suitable to lead a communist regime

11 posted on 04/04/2013 11:51:20 AM PDT by TSgt (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac; Bender2

RE: “President Obama then would be faced with making the war decision.”

Oh really? Wonder what the Constitution says about that?


12 posted on 04/04/2013 11:52:48 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac
“Don’t worry about China. If they let it happen, it’s their problem,” he said. “They are not going to war. China is not going to throw in a hundred thousand troops. China has got to keep this guy on a short leash. China is making so much money. They don’t want ill will around the world, trade embargoes. It’s not in their interest.”

Don't bet on it. China is still run by communists, and they always think in terms of power. They like having a weak and pliant puppet on their border.

13 posted on 04/04/2013 11:54:11 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

If such an attack did take place the U.S. response would be a sternly worded letter followed by an apology to N. Korea.


14 posted on 04/04/2013 11:58:11 AM PDT by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

“Korean spring”.

If we had, quite literally, ANY other President in our history to make that choice I’d be okay with it. Even Carter, previously the worst President of my lifetime.

But Baraq Obama could screw up a one-car funeral.


18 posted on 04/04/2013 11:59:34 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Really?

And what will we do when the 24,000,000 souls, having been trapped in a concentration for 50 years, start rushing southward in search of a decent meal?

We are going to be in deep kimchee, that’s what.

Face it, we are going to have to leave the little bastard there or see South Korea over run with refugees looking for a better life.


19 posted on 04/04/2013 12:02:06 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

I have a feeling the NK military is working on regime change right now. Thats why Kim Jung Un is acting out.


20 posted on 04/04/2013 12:02:41 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

I wonder what China thinks of the muzziebrohood. I guess 0 can use the sequester cash to ship his brethren to NK.


21 posted on 04/04/2013 12:03:06 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

“Doubt if he has the cajones...”

Will he try to “vote present?” If he does, it will be the end of his presidency. A community organizer isn’t used to doing anything but stirring up $h!t, so this will be “uncharted ground” for FUBO.


23 posted on 04/04/2013 12:06:26 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

What could possibly go wrong?


25 posted on 04/04/2013 12:09:22 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Gay Leader Baby Kim can sense weakness when he sees it. Is there anyone who can’t, when a superpower’s supreme leader is a community organizer of a provincial ghetto community of illiterates?!


26 posted on 04/04/2013 12:11:06 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

The 28,000 US troops in Korea would be casualties within the first 48 hours of an all-out North Korean attack on South Korea. Therefore, it would be imperative for the US to launch a massive nuclear attack to elimate North Korea in retaliation. In no event should any American troops cross the DMZ; let the South Koreans do any mop up operations after the nuclear strikes.

If China intervenes, let them see their glittering new cities go up in flames from more nuclear strikes.


28 posted on 04/04/2013 12:15:51 PM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

If the US mainland is attacked with an EMP, no one will be sending any messages for a long, long time.


36 posted on 04/04/2013 12:29:03 PM PDT by fivecatsandadog (Let's not be so open-minded that our brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: illiac

Ø’s first response will most likely be to set an example to the Norks... for example, decreasing the US arsenal by another 80%. This will show them good faith and good will, and UN will surely be satisfied then and back down. After all, we have plenty... what’s [another] 80%?


37 posted on 04/04/2013 12:31:06 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson