Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot

What I don’t understand is what North Korea expects would be the American response to a use of nuclear missiles against the United States (or even against U.S. bases in other countries)? Has anyone ever bothered to ask the clown who runs that country?

North Korea might indeed have to power to do serious harm to the U.S., but not anything comparable to what the U.S. could do to it. I assume our response to a nuclear attack on the U.S. would be to destroy North Korea, to wipe it out, and put an end to its existence as a country. (Who knows, though, maybe Obama would merely file a complaint with the United Nations. ;-)

Have we reduced our store of nuclear weapons so far that we can’t do a large-scale nuclear attack on North Korea and still have enough remaining to be a deterrent to other possible enemies? The threat of massive retaliation prevented nuclear war for over half a century, does that deterrent no longer exist?


29 posted on 04/04/2013 8:01:42 PM PDT by GJones2 ( North Korean threats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: GJones2

‘might indeed have to power’ should be ‘might indeed have the power’


30 posted on 04/04/2013 8:04:26 PM PDT by GJones2 ( North Korean threats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: GJones2

“does that deterrent no longer exist”

No. Obama pledged that he’ll never use nuclear weapons.


39 posted on 04/05/2013 2:53:55 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson