To: oxcart
They must have put out there a arbitary number of cost because they really don't know the true cost of this mission and they know very well it could cost well over 3 times as much or more the cost they said of $ 100 Million.
Park this thing next to the Moon ? what idiots, so ? what happens if and when this thing decides to move towards earth and happens to kill people ?
To: American Constitutionalist
>> “what happens if and when this thing decides to move towards earth and happens to kill people ?” <<
.
partial fulfillment of UN agenda 21 (population reduction)
42 posted on
04/05/2013 6:39:50 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: American Constitutionalist
NASA will just call on George Bailey and Pecos Bill to lasso the moon!
45 posted on
04/05/2013 6:49:30 PM PDT by
JouleZ
(You are the company you keep.)
To: American Constitutionalist
Heck, they should just park it ON the moon, then mine it to their heart’s content.
46 posted on
04/05/2013 7:05:36 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: American Constitutionalist
You don’t understand. By increasing the mass of the earth, we can change our orbital path around the sun, thereby reducing global warming.
Of course, after we bring the additional mass onto the Earth, we then will have to increase the planet’s velocity to maintain the new orbit, so its important to start those taxes now.
If it fails, the asteroid would be like a giant mountain or star crashing into the sea. Who would ever think something like that could happen? (Rev 8:9-11)
54 posted on
04/06/2013 5:22:08 AM PDT by
Cvengr
(Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson