Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Woman Challenger (H-O-triple T) Rises to Primary Lindsey Graham
Liberty Paper ^

Posted on 04/09/2013 6:23:36 PM PDT by Perdogg

Insiders and grassroots activists are starting to zero in on a primary challenger to face off against embattled incumbent US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Graham has become extremely unpopular due to his votes on taxes, the NDAA, gun rights and his position on drones. He recently came out against Rand Paul’s filibuster, which created National backlash against him and is refusing to support Paul’s efforts to filibuster Obama’s attempt at Second Amendment restrictions.

(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertypaper.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gopprimary; graham; hottie; lindseygraham; lindseygrahamprimary; nancymace; sc; sc2014; southcarolina; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Perdogg
WOW! :o)


61 posted on 04/09/2013 9:55:36 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; upchuck; BillyBoy

I give her one “t”.


62 posted on 04/09/2013 10:27:18 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I wouldn’t say Lugar’s lack of support was trivial, but Mourdock would have won a close race if he hadn’t shot his fool mouth off.


63 posted on 04/09/2013 10:30:00 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight

Needless to say that is the problem.

Graham will likely win because of multiple challengers including one or more deliberately inserted by the party insiders.

The way to deal with this is to have a strong competent conservative 3rd party candidate waiting in the wings in case Lindsey Graham does win the GOP primary.

Conservatives must clearly send the message: “NO MORE VOTES FOR RINOS, NO, NOT, NEVER”


64 posted on 04/10/2013 12:47:17 AM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE MY DREAMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

How many of us actually believe there is still any point in voting? It looks to me as if going to the polls in 2014 will be the same as voting in Cuba under Castro or in Iraq under Saddam Hussein.


65 posted on 04/10/2013 5:34:44 AM PDT by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Quasimodo was better looking than either of those two.


66 posted on 04/10/2013 5:42:29 AM PDT by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

Re your post 60, Jim Nabors essentially dropped out of the public eye. On the other hand, Mr. Graham has been a politician for some time now, and I think if there was any information—or even rumors—that he was carrying on with another man, don’t you think that the Democrats in South Carolina would make this an issue? I do, and I cannot remember anything that was said in any campaign against him.

I repeat, it’s tiresome to read these unsubstantiated assertions on FR about Graham. Mind you, I don’t like the man and his politics but this constant barrage of statements that he is queer have no foundation.


67 posted on 04/10/2013 6:02:00 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Re your post 58, as I put it earlier, it is highly, highly unlikely that a man in his fifties could remain in the closet all this time, especially being a politician in South Carolina, right there in the Bible Belt. I suspect that homosexuals have higher sex drives than normal people and they could not restrain themselves.

Your point number two is getting closer to the real reason. IMHO.


68 posted on 04/10/2013 6:06:55 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Any Republican with a pulse should have been able to exceed Romney’s numbers. And Romney won Indiana by 54-44.

This was a real disaster.


69 posted on 04/10/2013 7:10:56 AM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; upchuck; BillyBoy

We’re friends on Facebook.


70 posted on 04/10/2013 7:32:41 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

then you will see the MSM publishing the evangelicals will stay home because so and so did not win. The MSM will pick Graham for the low information republics. (those senile rio linda types who think the internet is for kids and cellphones are not needed)


71 posted on 04/10/2013 8:10:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

1. YOU SAID:
“Graham will likely win because of multiple challengers including one or more deliberately inserted by the party insiders.”

THAT ASSERTION IS DEFINITELY NOT CORRECT—SEE MY POST 52 ABOVE.
*****************************************************
2. YOU SAID:
The way to deal with this is to have a strong competent conservative 3rd party candidate waiting in the wings in case Lindsey Graham does win the GOP primary.

Conservatives must clearly send the message: “NO MORE VOTES FOR RINOS, NO, NOT, NEVER”

I’M PRETTY SURE (OR AT LEAST I HOPE) THAT YOU LIKELY DID NOT INTEND IT, BUT THAT ADVOCATED APPROACH IS PROBABLY THE TYPE OF THING THE PROFESSIONALS AT THE D.N.C. PRAY WOULD COME ABOUT AS IT WOULD HELP INSURE CONTINUED PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT CONTROL OF THE SENATE.

We need to be careful so as to not inadvertently do the DNC’s work for them.


72 posted on 04/10/2013 8:16:34 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; upchuck; BillyBoy; sickoflibs; Gilbo_3

She’s a Citadel graduate and a beauty too.

Hopefully she’ll take ol’ Light In The Loafers Lindsay apart in the primary.


73 posted on 04/10/2013 8:45:39 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; Impy; Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; DarthVader; upchuck; BillyBoy; sickoflibs; Gilbo_3

Agreed!


74 posted on 04/10/2013 8:48:03 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

Nice blue eyes. Very cool.


75 posted on 04/10/2013 9:10:15 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

You bet!


76 posted on 04/10/2013 9:32:46 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

It all fits perfectly well. He is in the closet.

He doesn’t keep it hidden anymore at all really. It’s very obvious. You’ll notice it by his mannerisms. Look carefully at how his mouth moves, the words he uses, how he behaves in public.

The gaydar meter goes off the chart with Lindsey Graham. He is a liberal gay man posing in the closet as a “conservative politician.” And the problem is he doesn’t vote conservative any more.

Let’s vote him out.


77 posted on 04/10/2013 10:35:22 AM PDT by o2bfree (Lindsey Graham is left of South Carolina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

This guy could split the “gay republican” vote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/11/gay-gop-activist-considers-primary-against-sen-lindsey-graham/


78 posted on 04/10/2013 11:25:49 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

OK, you think, based upon nothing other than mannerisms (which definitely are not always indicative of homosexuality) that he is in the closet.

To believe this, you have to think that decades can go by and a person could completely conceal his homosexuality, possibly but damn unlikely.

No other possibilities come to mind, I suppose?


79 posted on 04/10/2013 12:45:24 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum

I believe Lindsey Graham is a homosexual in the closet. My friends at work believe the same thing. My wife believes Lindsey is gay. You believe he is not. That’s fine.

But unfortunately for Graham though, he provides his own evidence that people can review easily in the public domain. Photographs, videos, transcripts. His use of the language. The way he walks, talks, and his effeminate behavior are available for all to see. It’s damning evidence.

Lindsey also votes like a liberal. Case closed. Let’s vote him out.


80 posted on 04/10/2013 2:05:00 PM PDT by o2bfree (Lindsey Graham is left of South Carolina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson