Gotta pay for those parties somehow....
“WHEN YOUR OUTGO EXCEEDS YOUR INCOME, YOUR UPKEEP WILL BE YOUR DOWNFALL.” (Paul Harvey)
You know, this is all part of his never ending “PsyOps” against the people and the republicans.
He puts stuff out there, that has no chance of being passed. He knows it wont’ pass. His own democrats won’t even support it. The public has absolutely no idea what the bill, what’s in it, or how disastrous it is. On top of that, he takes no ownership of anything. All he has to say is, “I presented a budget and no one liked it. It’s all their fault”.
But, come prime time, the republicans are the reason it didn’t pass and they are bad.
For all the names he has been called on here, marxist-socialist- etc etc, he’s nothing more than a street hustling, punk. And I mean that with as much effeminacy as possible.
Boehner pissed away $650 BILLION in new taxes as part of the “fiscal cliff deal”
Now barky is back for the rest of the $1.3 TRILLION in NEW TAXES he has demanded since 2011
This is what “compromise” with Screwtape looks like
I’m having trouble with the Post’s logic:
“while the CBO forecasts a deficit of $616 billion in 2014, Obama calls for a larger gap between spending and revenues of $744 billion.”
— seems to say that the deficit Obama proposes would be $744 billion, which is higher than CBO’s forecast. Higher. An increase. The Post then goes on to say:
“[Obama’s] proposal would reduce the deficit by $1.8 trillion”
— what am I missing? They just said it would increase the deficit. By $744 billion.
-— And how would it reduce the deficit by $1.8 trillion? Their answer: “. . . by adding $580 billion in new taxes on the wealthy.”
How is $580 billion income going to pay off in $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction? Is the Post leaving out things like “over several years” or “among other revenues”?
Something is definitely failing here: my reading comprehension, their reporting, or their math.
He got his tax hike in January.
He’s determined to put the final nail in the the coffin of the USA
I’m still trying to find the “deficit reduction”. How is spending more than one takes in “deficit reduction”?