“...are not mentioned in the Bible..”
straw man arguement, That is why I avoid the trap and your other question. RV does not prove evolution.
(move on)
“......If creationist arguments are limited to understanding only those terms used in the Bible then they are not qualified to discuss scientific evidence...”
“if” Since they are not, they are therefore qualified.
Thank You
You are the one who said that “species” are not mentioned in the Bible. Is it therefore your contention that no creationist is qualified to, or can, incorporate the concept of “species” into their explanations?
If not then what was the point of that inane observation?
What is the difference between “micro” and “macro” evolution?
What mechanism would stop “micro” changes from accumulating into “macro” changes?
Would you characterize the difference between a mouse and a rat as a “micro” difference or a “macro” difference?
Does your inability to answer these simple questions speak to your qualifications to discuss scientific matters?