Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

thomas.loc.gov does not have a permanent link yet, so I posted the whole thing, it's CR S2613-2618 if you want to find it on Thomas or in the Congressional Record.
1 posted on 04/12/2013 6:56:13 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DBrow
Sickening.

I have some small hope that the House will turn this back.

2 posted on 04/12/2013 6:58:27 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Ping!

(Incredible)


3 posted on 04/12/2013 7:02:53 AM PDT by basil (basil, 2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

Ping


5 posted on 04/12/2013 7:08:47 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

Doesn’t this have to pass the house too?


9 posted on 04/12/2013 7:22:37 AM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks; smokingfrog; mylife; WorkerbeeCitizen

Here it is... If the House doesn’t turn this back, it’ll get ugly real quick.


15 posted on 04/12/2013 7:40:29 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (The most insidious power the news media has, is the power to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lightman

Ping to CWII.


16 posted on 04/12/2013 7:42:21 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (The most insidious power the news media has, is the power to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

18 posted on 04/12/2013 8:02:22 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
Well, I just read this entire piece of bullshyte. The chilling reality is these supposed 'deliberative' oligarchs not only contraqdict themselves but they insert language which gives them the broadest opportunites to 'regulate' and thus infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Do We The People really want the unJustice department of Eric Holder regulating what monies may be withheld from states or dictating what will be included in the 'federal registry' of individuals?

It appears that the republicants think they are merely signing on to pass a feel good sham legislation, so they appear to be doing something, whereas the democriups have inserted language which allows them and their henchgoons to regulate to the maximum what the republicants think is not being addressed/infringed.

What we have is tyranny on parade, treachery in the offing, and traitors to their oaths to defend and uphold OUR Constitution.

19 posted on 04/12/2013 8:07:44 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
in·fringe
/inˈfrinj/
Verb
Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright".
Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on: "infringe on his privacy".
Synonyms
violate - transgress - break - contravene - trespass

We all need to send this to every congresscritter

20 posted on 04/12/2013 8:10:41 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

I cannot read and understand all of that legalised languaged shyt,

Can anyone decipher it and tell me what it says?
\
Can those who vote on it tell what it says?


31 posted on 04/12/2013 9:47:22 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

Funny how easy this was to write, and doesn’t require 4 minutes of scrolling.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”


34 posted on 04/12/2013 10:59:39 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
The government wants to ban all the weapons THEY fear the most might be used against THEM. Make no mistake. That's what this is about.
39 posted on 04/12/2013 11:13:20 AM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

you tube has a video where a woman assemblyman from NY is seeking to ban HEAT SEEKING BULLETS! If used in hunting it would kill and cook the deer for you! (what? when did they come on the market?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNDNQWslCt8

Another video discusses a legilator who admits she has no clue what a barrel shroud is even though it is HER BILL!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zptNB4tkqDY

NONE of this matters because

THE MEDIUM IS THE MESSAGE

the medium is dead children. not substance.


40 posted on 04/12/2013 11:13:54 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

2008: Tears of joy, 0bama's their boy!

2013: Females cried, America died.

46 posted on 04/12/2013 11:19:00 AM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

If any of you want to learn something important, find out how many of your state and federal legislators are lawyers. And BTW, the main political lobby behind no-fault divorce and other destructions of family were bar associations.


47 posted on 04/12/2013 12:01:02 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
Mr. LEVIN - I can't wait until that rooster sucker retires.

Sturm, Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rife M-14/20CF. (Rollseyes)

How come cops and retired cops aren't banned from these?

``(D) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

OR. That's a key word in the Leahy/King/Collins scam. OR. WHO decides? Obamacare? is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this subparagraph shall only apply to a court order that--

PPO's are often standard in contentious divorce cases. Mr. KAINE

Fire Tim Kaine....

SA 715. Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. SCHUMER

Alright "NRA Joe" let's see what piece of crap you and Pat Tommey gave us.....

(2) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Public Safety and Second Amendment Rights Protection Act of 2013, the Secretary shall designate or establish a board that shall, upon request of a person under paragraph (1), assess whether a person cannot safely use, carry, possess, or store a firearm due to mental incompetency.

I don't like this. The Sec of Defense can take away the 2a rights of Veterans with a board? Who is on the board?

Looks like private sales at gun shows are all but banned outside of CPL holders.

C) the transfer is made between spouses, between parents or spouses of parents and their children or spouses of their children, between siblings or spouses of siblings, or between grandparents or spouses of grandparents and their grandchildren or spouses of their grandchildren, or between aunts or uncles or their spouses and their nieces or nephews or their spouses, or between first cousins, if the transferor does not know or have reasonable cause to believe that the transferee is prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm under Federal, State, or local law; or

And how do I prove that contradiction, Manchin? This is a piss poor written bill.

SEC. 142. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON MASS VIOLENCE. (a) Establishment of Commission.--There is established a commission to be known as the National Commission on Mass Violence (in this subtitle referred to as the ``Commission'') to study the availability and nature of firearms, including the means of acquiring firearms, issues relating to mental health, and all positive and negative impacts of the availability and nature of firearms on incidents of mass violence or in preventing mass violence.

Keeps this in the news.

This needs to be voted down. All of it, including Manchin/Toomey's amendment.

59 posted on 04/12/2013 2:22:59 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (If most people were more than keyboard warriors, we might have won the election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson