Jim Wallis of Sojourners, had argued that justice requires us to support (and even bless) same-sex unions, he also stated clearly that, I dont think the sacrament of marriage should be changed. Some people say that Jesus didnt talk about homosexuality, and thats technically true. But marriage is all through the Bible, and its not gender-neutral.
Now, Wallis has declared his support for the radical redefinition of marriage, explaining, I think we have to talk about, now, how to include same-sex couples in that deeper understanding of marriage. I want a deeper commitment to marriage that is more and more inclusive, and thats where I think the country is going.
What? These are the words of a noted Christian leader?
How seriously can Jim Wallis be taken when he tells us in 2008 that marriage is all through the Bible, and its not gender-neutral and then in 2012 wants to make it gender-neutral? And how can he imagine that by removing the most essential components of marriage, namely one man and one woman, marriage will be made stronger? This would be like suggesting that, since car sales are down, well say that bicycles and motorcycles are cars. (This is not meant to be a precise analogy but rather illustrative.)
And if Wallis truly wants to make marriage more and more inclusive, then he needs to embrace polygamous marriage and polyamorous marriage and more. Does he really mean what he says?
And has Wallis forgotten that as Christians, we do not determine our values by looking at where the country is going? Instead, as followers of Jesus, we are called to swim against the conformist, worldly tide of the age, calling society back to the timeless ways of God. Yet Jim Wallis wants to redefine marriage and make it gender-neutral based on where the country is going.
Behold the effects of drinking the same-sex marriage Kool-aid!
Jim Wallis is a socialist first. Keep that in mind.