Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Many Positions to Fill, Employers Wait for Perfection
New York Times ^ | 03/06/2013 | By CATHERINE RAMPELL

Posted on 04/18/2013 6:44:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: SeekAndFind

It’s obamacare plain and simple.


41 posted on 04/18/2013 7:56:35 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

OMG. how deluded. nowhere in that article (that I saw, but I didn’t manage to wretch my way completely through it) did they mention the terror that obamacare has wrought on the business community.

no one knows what the expense of an FTE is going to be next year, so OF COURSE hiring managers are being extraordinarily careful about adding employees.

that’s just ridiculous.


42 posted on 04/18/2013 7:58:22 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

OMG. how deluded. nowhere in that article (that I saw, but I didn’t manage to wretch my way completely through it) did they mention the terror that obamacare has wrought on the business community.

no one knows what the expense of an FTE is going to be next year, so OF COURSE hiring managers are being extraordinarily careful about adding employees.

that’s just ridiculous.


43 posted on 04/18/2013 7:58:30 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

But in fact, most places are diddling around, counting the savings every month that they’re getting from all the unfilled positions

I tend to agree. It’s almost as if they take enough time, they can just say- ‘see, we went all that time without the position filled and we survived, so let’s just eliminate it.’ I also think companies unwillingness to want to spend any money/time training is a little ridiculous. I don’t care what kind of skills you have, when you start with a new company, you have to be trained for that company. They waste more time and money fooling around with the interview process than if they would just take a good candidate and invest a little bit in them.


44 posted on 04/18/2013 8:05:36 AM PDT by usmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“Every now and then the NYTimes stumbles over the truth. “

More likely the truth gets accidentally published because it slipped by due to poor oversight by lazy editors.


45 posted on 04/18/2013 8:15:15 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
But in fact, most places are diddling around, counting the savings every month that they’re getting from all the unfilled positions.

So, you agree with NYT that employers are evil? That is the tone of the article. You seem to be saying evil employers are simply being skinflints to inflate the bottom line at the cost of throwing innocent children in the street.

NYT and the rest of the enemedia outlets are doing their best to ignore people like Senator Max Baucus (D-MT), who said small businesses are frozen in their hiring because Obastardcare is a giant unknown in their staffing cost center.

46 posted on 04/18/2013 8:25:32 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
If you haven’t been able to evaluate me with 3 interviews your organization is so fundamentally flawed and unorganized I don’t want to work for you.

It's common at Apple for a potential hire to have to go through at least 7, and up to 11 interview appointments for senior tech positions, spread out over weeks.

47 posted on 04/18/2013 8:39:43 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wbill

“If a company called me back 6 times, I’d think that they didn’t have their act together, and would doubt I’d want to work there.”

I agree. When we post an ad, there is absolutely no way we would want an applicant come back for even a 3rd time on most cases. It just shows the company is disorganized, indecisive and inept.

The only important question we ask them, really is: “what do you think of Obama?”. If they go into full libtard drool mode, we kick them out and go to the next interview...


48 posted on 04/18/2013 8:40:39 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: max americana
what do you think of Obama

Hmmmmm. You hiring?

49 posted on 04/18/2013 8:56:36 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wbill

We did. Wished there was an FR job bank or job section for each city so only like-minded people will be considered and hired. IMHO, I’ve been thinking of e-mailing Jim to consider it..


50 posted on 04/18/2013 9:01:03 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: max americana
That's probably not a bad idea. Likely violates about million gov't regs, though.

Not that it bothers me in the least. :-)

I'm fortunate to be in a fairly conservative field (IT). Companies I've worked for range from "Unabashedly Liberal" to "We can neither confirm nor deny that we have have political leanings, if indeed said political leanings ever existed in the first place. So, please, please don't sue us!" But, doing what I do insulates me pretty well from the rest of the company. Especially since I'm not out in the user community anymore.

I gotta say that the liberal companies were easy to work for, in that their standards were so darned low. When I get a little closer to retirement, and want a nice, easy glide path....I'd give them some consideration again.

51 posted on 04/18/2013 9:07:50 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

I would say more that they are indecisive and hesitant to act. If they find a guy who’s perfect and will work for half the regular salary, they’ll hire him, otherwise they’ll keep looking.

Why shouldn’t they?


52 posted on 04/18/2013 9:36:37 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

If customers aren’t receiving the goods because you’re understaffed, you need to make the hire.


53 posted on 04/18/2013 9:43:59 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wbill

“I gotta say that the liberal companies were easy to work for, in that their standards were so darned low.”

LOl, with my experience, that’s true.


54 posted on 04/18/2013 11:24:12 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson