Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clintonh8r
"Because that would be admitting that they don’t have a clue. Literally."

Or, they have a clue and don't like the conclusion drawn from the "ethnicity"/purpose of the perps.
10 posted on 04/18/2013 7:37:04 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi

This administration don’t do clues. They do complicity.


36 posted on 04/18/2013 8:27:31 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: rollo tomasi

Yesterday we heard the FBI investigators were showing around an image and questioning people. I heard at least two reports say they had seen the images, but WOULD NOT describe them. Which begs the question, if the FBI didn’t want the images widely distributed, for whatever reason, why the hell would they be showing the images to reporters...? These reporters weren’t at the event. They are the last person you’d show if you truly didn’t want the pictures to spread. I don’t understand any of this.

This makes me wonder two things....

1.). Were the pictures leaked and then the media was asked not to publish them? If the pictures were leaked, was it done to subvert an ongoing coverup?

2.). More ominously, do they anticipate a possible second strike locally and want the reporters and their crews to know these faces.


38 posted on 04/18/2013 8:46:30 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson