Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oxcart

I thought anti-sodomy laws were already ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court back in 2003?


3 posted on 04/18/2013 9:58:34 AM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyanExile

Sodomites want the stigma removed and the laws stricken from the books. Something they were unable to accomplish through the legislatures which is why they went the activist judge route.


4 posted on 04/18/2013 9:59:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile

Sodomites want the stigma removed and the laws stricken from the books. Something they were unable to accomplish through the legislatures which is why they went the activist judge route.


5 posted on 04/18/2013 9:59:56 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile

that’s what I thought too... and yet ... I saw an article here posted the other day about a teacher that had oral sex with a young male student being charged for “sodomy” and could face up to LIFE in prison for it!


6 posted on 04/18/2013 10:01:14 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile; a fool in paradise
I thought anti-sodomy laws were already ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court back in 2003?

The laws still remained on several states' books after the Court decision, which only prevented them from being enforced. Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas still have their anti-sodomy laws officially in their penal codes.

This is not good for Montana, because the sodomite lobby, as always, deem permission as promotion (which is exactly what they did with Lawrence v. Texas), and are likely to now launch a massive campaign to push their perverted agenda in schools and workplaces with the State's enforcement powers.

They've been fighting to have Kansas' anti-homosexual sodomy law stricken, but have not succeeded - yet. I pray that they never do. It remains as a public sanction against their perversion.

18 posted on 04/18/2013 1:07:27 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile; a fool in paradise
I thought anti-sodomy laws were already ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court back in 2003?

The laws still remained on several states' books after the Court decision, which only prevented them from being enforced. Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas still have their anti-sodomy laws officially in their penal codes.

This is not good for Montana, because the sodomite lobby, as always, deem permission as promotion (which is exactly what they did with Lawrence v. Texas), and are likely to now launch a massive campaign to push their perverted agenda in schools and workplaces with the State's enforcement powers.

They've been fighting to have Kansas' anti-homosexual sodomy law stricken, but have not succeeded - yet. I pray that they never do. It remains as a public sanction against their perversion.

19 posted on 04/18/2013 1:11:08 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson