Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

People who are this defensive usually have something to hide.......


7 posted on 04/18/2013 11:03:11 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMan55
“I am not going to answer that question it is so full of misstatements and misapprehension that it’s just not worthy of an answer…there’s been so much reported on this that’s been wrong I can’t even begin to tell you, congressman,” Napolitano replied. “We will provide you with accurate information as it becomes available.”

Yeah and I bet you have the audacity to send out Susan Rice to tell it?

Treason Is what it is! If the HOR had any men with balls left in it they would be drafting Articles of Impeachment over it. After they were done Convicting them of a coverup over Bengazi.

27 posted on 04/18/2013 11:08:25 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMan55

“Not worthy of an answer”

What does that mean?

Here’s the entire exchange from the article:

“We have someone who’s being deported due to national security concerns,” Duncan had said during a Capitol Hill hearing Thursday. “We’ve got this guy who was there, we know he was there…and yet we’re going to deport him? We’re going to remove him from the scene?”

“If I might, I am unaware of anyone who is being deported for national security concerns at all related to Boston,” Napolitano said.

“He is being deported,” Duncan said.

Napolitano said as she understood it, the man was not technically a person of interest or a suspect, and “this is is an example of why it is so important to let law enforcement do its job.”

“I want them to do their job,” Duncan said. “Wouldn’t you agree with me that it’s negligent for us as an American administration to deport someone who was reportedly at the scene of the bombing and we’re going to deport him, not to be able to question him anymore?”

“I am not going to answer that question it is so full of misstatements and misapprehension that it’s just not worthy of an answer…there’s been so much reported on this that’s been wrong I can’t even begin to tell you, congressman,” Napolitano replied. “We will provide you with accurate information as it becomes available.”

*******************************************

Point out the misstatements. Point our the misapprehensions. Correct him, put him in his place with the truth.

Instead she dodged it and her closer it the best lie out there.

So without more accurate information, which she cannot present at this time, how can she know or we know what the truth is?


68 posted on 04/18/2013 11:21:14 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMan55
People who are this defensive usually have something to hide.......

You bet! I think that 0dumb0 & Napalitano & the rest of their corrupt administration are doing everything they can to block the investigation, distort it, obfuscate, and all of a sudden they are being caught with their hand in the cookie jar. Of course OTOH, the media will do everything in their power to block this story and to continue with their chanting mantra "right-wing domestic terrorist"! In fact if the Saudi is deported and if no other suspects are fingered, that will suit 0dumb0 & the media & his corrupt cronies just fine, so they can go back to demonizing gun owners & the NRA.

145 posted on 04/18/2013 12:53:35 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson