You're a part of the problem. Your policy is why we have so much potential for domestic terrorism. You position is why those responsible for the Boston bombing were in this country. That's a fact.
I know there is a domestic terrorist threat. A lot of that threat has come with the increase in Islamic immigration since 9/11. We already have laws for this threat. We don't need new ones, and I will not support any new ones that have any potential to suspend the Constitutional rights of American citizens. I have no idea what you believe. You oppose my immigration stance, and make little sense with your weird talk about the arrest of domestic terrorist, or domestic terrorist attacks; without letting anyone know what the hell your trying to say with these statements. You're refuting things I haven't said. What imaginary point are you debating? Try to make sense, or stop bothering me with your strange nonsense.
I like how you point out a simple mistake in my grammar. It's a sign you have nothing else. You created a delusional debate about domestic terrorism that didn't exist in reality. I guess you had nothing the moment you started putting words in my mouth, and started aggressively refuting them in your little fantasy.
Guardians of the Republic - www.OathKeepers.org
>>You are debating things I haven’t even been talking about
That’s because I live in reality land and you’re living on fantasy island.
A lot of that threat has come with the increase in Islamic immigration since 9/11
Meanwhile, in reality land -- The Jamaat ul-Fuqra camp near Hartsel was active >10 years earlier.
Where did Malcom X, Lois Fairycon and the Black Panthers immigrate from?
Terrorism, domestic and otherwise is an ideological issue.
How are Vern Howell, Dennis Mahon, and Tom Metzger doing these days?
Try harder.
>>Guardians of the Republic - www.OathKeepers.org
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=OathKeepers+%22Ron+Paul
LOL That the same Ron Paul who advocates giving Iran nuclear weapons?
Oops!
NO SALE