Posted on 04/21/2013 4:40:36 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
Check out my new video at 41, pls.
On target as usual.
Slick. Love it!
We keep no one, not even our stated enemies, out of this country then spend money to arm the government to attack us.
Well I hate to point out the obvious, but their gestapo tactis DIDN'T catch the a..hole. An ordinary serf found him.
Almost everything? I may be reiterating the obvious, BUT THE BOSTON STORM TROOPERS DIDN'T CATCH THE JERK WITH THEIR GESTAPO TACTICS. An ordinary guy found him about 15 minutes after the brown shirts let them out of their houses.
Excellent updated message!
If I didn’t know better, I might suspect that our own govt was trying to wreck the country, destroy freedom, and install a “progressive” dictatorship.
Wait a minute....
My first post was pull because the SHTF link I posted had a reference to a InfoWars statement on the video. The link itself nor the story was from InfoWars. The second posting I made link to the youtube video directly with no reference to InfoWars it only links were The Daily Sheeple and SHTF Plan. So why it was pulled I have no idea as I got no notice (As I did with my first post) as to why.
Ordering millions of Bostonians to stay inside their homes on “lockdown” (a term that comes to us from PRISONS, btw) took their millions of eyes out of the hunt. 10,000 armed paramilitary “police” never did find the perp after a full day of aggressive searching
Yet 1/2 hour AFTER the “lockdown” was lifted, a CIVILIAN found the perp hiding in his backyard. If the civilian had not been locked in his house by police orders, he would have checked his yard 14 hours earlier, and found the perp early in the morning, and saved Boston from “lockdown.”
BTW, what law or right did the police have to tell millions of free, innocent Americans to stay in their homes? “Lockdown” is what the guards do to unruly inmates in our PRISONS. When did America become a virtual PRISON anytime the police decide?
What right did the police have to do aggressive warrantless “home invasion” searches, dragging Americans outside like criminals? Do the actions of the paramilitary “police” in Boston bother you at all?
So when a dangerous criminal is lose you no longer have any fourth Amendment Rights? The police can just enter your home at will? What other Amendment get suspended in such a situation, because I would like to know?
Preppers’ PING!!
Some of us may have to rethink our plans to bug in during SHTF.
The order has been given for “The USA to look exactly like the rest of the world.”
This was even referenced on Sundays (Yesterday’s) programs.
Looks like the result of being on a LIST.
No.
"The police can just enter your home at will?"
No.
"What other Amendment get suspended in such a situation, because I would like to know?"
None
Well then somebody should tell the police that, because apparently they didn’t get the memo.
“By violating the 4th, are you saying that they forcibly entered the homes?”
Yes, they did. Go google for the videos. Several have already been posted online.
Well said.
Violent criminals run from the police every day. I spent 20 years in law enforcement, and in Washington, DC manhunts for armed robbers, carjackers, rapists and murderers who had just evaded police occurred about 3 times a week in my district alone. While we have, on occasion, gone door to door, it was to A) warn residents and B) ask them if they had seen the guy. I never went door to door into peoples' homes looking for a suspect. Each knock on the door was a request, not a demand. I've had citizens tell me to F*** off when I knocked on their door during a manhunt. I thanked them and wished them well, and left.
Either there is a 4th Amendment, or there isn't. I wonder if any citizens refused police entry into their homes during the Boston event and, if they did, what the police response was. I bet it wasn't good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.