Skip to comments.
Firefighters recount deadly blast
Wall Street Journal ^
| April 21, 2013
| Ukn
Posted on 04/22/2013 8:50:18 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
U.S. NEWSApril 21, 2013, 8:13 p.m. ET Firefighters Recount Blast In First Interviews, Volunteer Responders Give Accounts of Texas Explosion
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: ammoniumnitrate; fertilizer; west
To: Pikachu_Dad
Yeah, but before they recounted the incident was there some men in black with those silver memory errase thingys ?
To: Pikachu_Dad
To: American Constitutionalist
4
posted on
04/22/2013 10:15:12 AM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
WSJ confirms 3 round tanks were for grain storage.
WSJ confirms that fertilizer building was both the source of the fire and explosion.
5
posted on
04/22/2013 10:19:33 AM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
A bit loose with the facts here:
” The one here stored as much as 270 tons of ammonium nitrate, a common fertilizer that has been used as an explosive”
Ammonium nitrate mixed with fuel oil (ANFO) is what is used as the explosive. Ammonium nitrate by itself is not used as an explosive.
ANFO is used because it is cheap and more stable than other explosives.
Still no word from any source on how the plant handled and stored the ammonium nitrate.
NW corner of the building appears to be the source of the blast. The side photos appear to show a crater. The top photos show an area of fresh dirt.
6
posted on
04/22/2013 10:25:33 AM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
Ammonium nitrate by itself is not used as an explosive. But, ammonium nitrate by itself can be explosive, under certain circumstances. It requires heating or a source of ignition, and at least partial confinement.
The technical term is transition from deflagration to detonation.
7
posted on
04/22/2013 11:22:49 AM PDT
by
justlurking
(tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
To: justlurking
What was the cause of the fire?
Why were there no fire alarms?
- First notification was the police calling.
Why did the fire spread so quickly?
- Ammonium nitrate does not burn well.
- The building was fully engulfed very quickly.
8
posted on
04/23/2013 7:35:36 AM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
Yes, it really happened I saw the movie I tell ya.
But on a more serious note, how much you want to bet ?
As just like when a covert spy comes back home on a mission, or our military in a war and our governement takes them into debriefing they are asked questions and told that's not how the whole thing happened, therefore ? when questioned by the public " I can't recall what happened, or I have no knowledge of what happened, or this is how it really happned. " .
Plausible deniability.
To: Pikachu_Dad
Some of the facts and news are fast and foot lose.
There have been reports that there was a fire early in the day and the fire fighters came and thought it was put it.
Other news said that there was a strong thunder storm that came into the area and set off the blaze with lighting.
Other reports say that there was no personel or workers at the plant at the time.
This incident reminds me of the Gulf Horizon supposed accident a few years ago in the Gulf of Mexico.
To: Pikachu_Dad
Also ? there is no way for them to account for any of that stuff now since it's gone.
This whole incident is fishy.
To: American Constitutionalist
12
posted on
05/11/2013 12:26:36 AM PDT
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: Pikachu_Dad
How about that, what a coincidence.
So they can't blame it on a wild lightning strike ?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson