Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Personally speaking, I have never understood how anyone who has already crossed the line of thinking that the gender requirements of one male to one female are "irrelevant" to constituting a marriage would have any problem with voluntary polygamy involving the liberal mantra called "consenting adults".
1 posted on 04/22/2013 5:00:24 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ReformationFan
There is NO LOGIC to their arguments. Any MAN can marry any WOMAN that will have him.....and vice versa. So much for the ‘equal protection’ clause. I am waiting for one of the proponents to put his/her fingers in their ears and stamp their feet in front of the Supreme Court. Near as I can tell, they want what they want and don't care about anything else, so there! And you better do what they want or you are A) homophobic, B) a bully or both! Oh wait, I forgot racist.
2 posted on 04/22/2013 5:11:35 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan
This problem was highlighted at the Supreme Court last month in oral argument over California’s Proposition 8, the state constitutional amendment that defines marriage as a union of a man and a woman.

In time, the parties involved will be living beings and other living beings. And maybe in future, enlightened jurists will extend it to inanimate objects.

3 posted on 04/22/2013 5:22:57 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ReformationFan

Problem is polygamy has been practiced and accepted longer then sodomy. If liberals are willing to accept sodomy, then their feminists cannot argue against polygamy. IMHO polygamy will offer economy of scale, more exemptions and the head of household will benefit more financially then the traditional couple or gay couple. IRS will definitely be against this. Let us see, average income is 50,000 for a couple, a man with five working wives can have a family income of 150,000 plus six exemptions without kids. While a couple making 150,000 can get only two exemptions without kids. Plus the first wife faces competition from four new wives, the guy may be busy but he has the driver seat in such a family. Besides this will accommodate Muslims, not bad for diversity. If Muzzie men are too busy managing their five wives, they do not have time nor energy to bomb US marathons. Less stressful for bachelors. Can’t decide which girlfriend to marry, marry them all.


4 posted on 04/22/2013 5:29:04 PM PDT by Fee (9/11 first shaking; 2008 finance collapse second shaking; 2015 ????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson