Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BfloGuy

Rand Paul DID NOT say he was for drone strikes, he said SURVEILANCE

using them to search for the bombers with infra red is no different than the helicopters that were doing it

he said nothing about drone STRIKES - but they immediately jumped on him as if he did


3 posted on 04/23/2013 4:20:37 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

He basically said all citizens are the property of the government, and they can do whatever they want with their property.


9 posted on 04/23/2013 4:26:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

“I’ve never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on,” Paul said. “If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash. I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him.”

Sounds like he’s ok with a bit more than just surveillance here.


14 posted on 04/23/2013 4:39:18 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson