I’m trying to figure out what the problem is here.
I see problems with NOT disclosing who the company has hired as attorneys or consultants to advise them on union-organizing activities.
I also can’t see how this is a big burden on companies. It will come down to a routine filing by the attorney or consultant.
Read the linked study in the article. Also, this is a further action by the NLRB packed by Obama with illegal appointments under legal challenge. Additionally, this would require a formal disclosure whenever a company seeks legal advice in this area. So much for attorney client privilege. It will also open up the attorneys to direct action by militant unionists and their allies.