The Senate Judiciary Committee held two hearings earlier this week in advance of marking up the Gang of Eight’s comprehensive amnesty bill. The first was a nearly 8-hour long marathon with a parade of witnesses from Big Business to Big Labor to Special Interest groups with just a few witnesses sprinkled in to testify about the need for more interior enforcement, better border security, and the huge fiscal drain that an amnesty would have on the nation’s future.
The following day, the Committee brought in DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano.
Here’s what we learned. . .
NUMBER ONE
Every part of the bill was written as though America is facing a severe labor shortage crisis. Monday’s hearing featured one industry spokesperson after another who testified that Americans from high-school drop outs to the laid off engineer were either too lazy or too uneducated to fill U.S. labor needs at the wages being offered. The only guarantees in the bill concern large increases in the pool of available foreign workers, including millions of illegal workers who receive amnesty.
NUMBER TWO
The legalization comes first. There are no hard enforcement triggers for the initial amnesty (legalization + work permits). Chris Crane, ICE Officer and President of the National ICE Council testified to that on Monday. No one disputed that point and it has been reported in the press.
NUMBER THREE
Sen. Schumer and company called Sen. Rubio’s bluff: Back in January, Rubio promised, “If, in fact, this bill does not have real triggers in there...if there is not language in this bill that guarantees that nothing else will happen unless these enforcement mechanisms are in place, I won’t support it.”
Since the bill has been available to read, Rubio has issued repeated statements that are contradicted by his own legislation and by Schumer.
NUMBER FOUR
No one seems capable of explaining what will happen to future illegal aliens if the bill passes (see Roy’s blog).
The bill excludes post-December 31, 2011 illegal aliens. What happens to them? The bill also calls for expanded guest worker programs. What happens to the guest workers who don’t go home when their work visa expires?
Will the administration ramp up interior enforcement to detect and remove illegal aliens not covered by the bill? Or will the administration adopt the “attrition through enforcement” approach both the White House and Gang of Eight have decried? Or will the bill preserve the status quo immigration enforcement that gives “prosecutorial discretion” to non-violent aliens unlawfully residing and working in the country, thus building up a new illegal population to be amnestied at a later date? The bill doesn’t say. The bill’s authors won’t say.
Title is altered due to space...
Flush the damned nation destroying bill down the TOILET!! McCain is an IDIOT for pushing this treasonous GARBAGE!!
and Now Rubio and even Paul who we had high hopes for are signing on to this nonsense. It’s MADNESS!!
WAKE-UP America!!
RESIST TYRANNY!!
Can’t say “gobbledygook”
Not PC.
bflr
Thanks AuntB for keeping us abreast of the Rubio/Schumer follies!
Seriously, FReepers, call your Senators!
STOP THIS INSANITY.
NO BILL SHOULD EXCEED 100 PAGES!
We’re entitled to be able to read it and fully understand it.
IT’S AMNESTY AND THE END OF OUR REPUBLIC!
Any bill whose language is that complicated should be voted down on the principle that laws need to be clear and simply written.
Any bill whose language is that complicated should be voted down on the principle that laws need to be clear and simply written.
Yes, let's not set a precedent of having Senators actually understand what the heck they are voting on. That'd be crazy. Almost as if the Senate was intended to be a slow-moving, more deliberate body to place a check on the hot-headedness of the "populist" House.
Any senator or representative should live by one rule first, NEVER vote yes on any bill that cannot be comprehended by the people who are expected to obey the law. This would eliminate most proposed legislation and that would be a great thing, no “AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE ACT” and you could add on a very long list of other abominations that have been signed into law. We have boatloads of laws that cannot even be understood by lawyers.
“Judiciary Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)”
Interesting how depending on the day and the issue this traitor to the Constitution is labeled as a D or as an I when in fact he runs as a socialist.
Another enemy from within trying to force a vote on something not fully understood by the Senate.
A republican with a backbone (rare) would call him out on forcing a vote on something this complex without full disclosure and understanding.
How is this allowed without tar and pitchforks?
In labor relations, we called reading the opposition’s proposals,”looking for fish hooks”.
844 pages to say they all get to stay and bring their family too.
The Devil is in the Details.
And greater complexity means more errors.