Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

Seems like the authors of the various sections of the bill ought to be called to explain parts that are not clear.

There is no way I would sign off on something I didn’t understand.


16 posted on 04/25/2013 11:53:25 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: cymbeline
"Seems like the authors of the various sections of the bill ought to be called to explain parts that are not clear."

You don't want that. They might "explain" that it means x, when the legal language means y. You really want to understand the legal language and you shouldn't need someone to explain it to you.

The fact that they are having to "decipher" it, means it's was probably deliberately written to be overly complex to hide it's true meaning.

17 posted on 04/25/2013 12:03:50 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cymbeline
"Seems like the authors of the various sections of the bill ought to be called to explain parts that are not clear."

You don't want that. They might "explain" that it means x, when the legal language means y. You really want to understand the legal language and you shouldn't need someone to explain it to you.

The fact that they are having to "decipher" it, means it's was probably deliberately written to be overly complex to hide it's true meaning.

18 posted on 04/25/2013 12:03:50 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson